Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

   Instructions: Choose one of the problems we have read about in this course and argue for or against it. You may also choose to take a moderate stance (for example: some abortions are acceptable, but others are not) however if you do so, you must make clear what distinguishes acceptable from unacceptable abortions and argue why this is so. You may also choose to use one of the ethical theories we have discussed (Utilitarianism, Social Contract, Virtue Theory, Kantian, Rawls, Hobbes) to help your argument, however you do not have to.
    In general, this paper must meet these important criteria:
        It must state what is the right-making or wrong-making feature of the policy/action/issue you are arguing against. For example:
            I will argue for abortion, because it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. (In this case, happiness is the right-making feature of the action).
            I will argue that euthanasia should be legal, on grounds of body autonomy and personal freedom. (In this case, increased personal freedom is the right-making feature of euthanasia).
        It must define the issue. This can be any of the issues we have read about in the second half of the course or it can be another issue (such as immigration or election reform). Either way, the issue must be carefully defined in scope and what you mean must be laid out for the reader. Please note, if you choose an issue we have not discussed, you must clear it with me first!
        
        If you use outside sources, they MUST BE PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES/JOURNALS. The internet is absolutely filled with people who will lie to you, to your digital face, to further their own agenda, and they will make it look like they are legitimate and unbiased. This is especially true of medical/scientific information related to drugs and abortion.