Introduction

            The Death of Ivan Ilyich is one of the modern materials that were written to emancipate the general public about the importance of maintaining peace within society. As one of the modern lacerating works, it means the life that a person undergoes through will enable the community to understand the dynamics of the society. Regardless of the differences in individual cultural diversities, what could have been the reason as to why a person participated in war should not be used as the basis for tarnishing his or her picture (Tolstoy et al., 2015). From these perspectives, the truth is that maintaining peace in the society is one of the parameters that have the propensity of improving the wellbeing of each person.

             Nonetheless, in the process of reading the book, "The Death of Ivan Ilyich" tries to display to the community the negative consequences of living the life such a person lived.  As the book continues to unfold, we came to realize the fact that Ivan Ilyich's ultimate motive entailed making decisions that could make him to have financial gains. Thus, before he died, what he could have gone though is what illuminates the fact that everything that sounds to be meaningful to the community is what ultimately counts towards improving the perspectives of the community. it is, therefore, logical to say that a person needs to reap from his or her efforts. In the process of utilizing the existing mechanisms to make money, it is important for a person to reconsider the impacts that have on the community (Leo, 2019).  From the same perspective, it is important for a person to take into account some of the managerial and societal doctrines that exist.

            Taking into account what had transpired within his life, the truth is that his desire and materialism is what ended up making him to be miserable. The jealousy or the false motives a person uses for the purpose of enriching himself can be said to be of no benefit. In order for a person to live a fully live, it is important for him or her to ensure that the efforts bestowed towards executing a certain task is the one that pays. For instance, we came to realize that after the death of Ilyich, the motives that his friends had entailed ensuring that they have secured his position or just being elevated to the highest position. Despite that, it was obvious that Ilyich had failed to establish a good relationship with them. The failure of establishing such a relationship is what in return made his colleagues and community members fail to establish a good relationship.

            Ideally, the indifferences that were existing within his community are what that is perceived to have the propensity of deterring from spending a pleasant moment.  From the perspectives of those who could have attended to use his plight as a claim could have been based on the fact that there was a tedious demand on an individual. From the perspectives of the work a person does, it can be stated that individual consequences like the ones that Ilyich had lived, should not be the grim of the community (Leo, 2019). In this case, it means that deeming someone as the ultimate reason for reprimanding the society should not have been based on the life he or she lived. This is to imply that despite the life that a person could have lived, the community and its members should not be burdened with the need for enriching themselves. This is because his motives were the ones that the company continued to embrace as a means of increasing the output of each of them (Tolstoy et al., 2015). On the other hand, due to the fact that there could have been various social expectations, pleasing everyone could have been an impossible task to encounter.

Conclusion

             From the above analysis, it can be argued that living an unhappy life is what makes a person to encounter difficulties in life initially being enjoyed.  Individual motives are perceived to be one of the parameters that make him or her terminate his or her life. To counter the effect of that, it is important for a person to ensure that his or her materialistic desires have not deterred him from doing or laying emphasis on the work to be done. What this implies is the fact that obsession for material things is what makes a person fail in performing better as stipulated by policies formulated by the organization. Perceiving an organization to be an avenue for enriching someone cannot be the basis for making such an individual to encounter social pleases.  On the other hand, failing to be with ones’ family cannot be utilized as the ultimate basis for work prominence. Safeguarding individual presence with outsiders is what is deemed to be the only reason a person encounter family and social alienations. Typically, materialism, single-mindedness, and social conformity is what makes a person to experience social isolation and unhappiness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Leo, T. (2019). The Death of Ivan Ilyich. Strelbytskyy Multimedia Publishing

Tolstoy, L., Slater, N. P., & In Kahn, A. (2015). The death of Ivan Ilyich and other stories. Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press