Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

Explain the result of the Chevron case and what is meant by the ‘two-step’ approach? Do you agree with this approach? Why or why not?

2.In the Baker case, the court is saying that ingredients that are in interstate commerce require the entire product to be subject to federal regulation despite the final product being assembled and sold within a single state.

What if the drug being made was derived solely from a tree in the middle of Palm Springs, California. The water comes from a spring in central California. All manufacturing and distribution is in California. Do you think the court would have found for the defendant? Do you really think it matters or should matter? What if the water came from the Sierra Nevada Mountains (which cross Nevada and California), would that change the analysis?