Juvenile Justice System and Cultural Comparisons

In States where Juvenile searches is allowed an officer may conduct search without any warrant, the courts have certain way of appraising including if the juvenile had had erstwhile justice system interaction. For the very young juveniles, they have the audacity to wave Miranda rights as soon as they consult with the guardian. The law and order enforces has the discretion to apprehend a juvenile if there is serious offence, number of the occurrence, and lastly prior mention in the court. The ultimatum of the situation such as characteristics and attitudes is up to the discretion of the police to consider and on the wider perspective is the predisposition emanating from the officers. The police department ought to ensure discretion is applied in effective and nondiscriminatory way through control of the law, extra trainings on how to handle juveniles apart from the written guidelines. Nonetheless, there are those varied strategies which have been widely cited as the best means when addressing juvenile delinquency, taking an active part of the society would amount to better community policing. The issues of court fragmentation can be solved through systematized jurisdiction responsibilities right from the county to State levels. The relationships in juvenile courts are restricted so as to safeguard the interest of the juveniles in attaining justice.

The court hearing of a juvenile undergoes three profound steps which differ from the criminal court. Subsequently, when juveniles receive penalties from criminal court there would be high chances of harshness and perhaps the severe exposure. After the judgements have been passed the juvenile can be transferred to the many community correction centers where intensive supervision can be instilled. The juvenile justice system works to the best interest of the juvenile delinquents whilst putting the interest of the society, although placing them at secure institution would always is the last resort. In early days twentieth and twilight of nineteen century before reforms were instigated, police dealt with juvenile crime offenders in their own way of discretion. Also, during the same time policewomen roles with those of the male counter parts were different, male apprehended them as the female helped in follow up. However, when the offences are much serious same as demonstrating no chances of being amenable juveniles might be forced to face restricted movement in fortified institution. During their confinement at correctional facilities they are prompted to receive external services such as value of education, training, psychotherapy, and treatment as well. All this are aimed at transforming delinquent inmates.

Divorce is no longer strange in our contemporary societies thanks to the appreciation and tolerance of various alternate family structures. Poverty on the other hand has derailed families insignificantly; helplessness to plan ahead plus other crucial judgement are to be blamed. And, you will find that children are subjected to a number of physical damages, at worst would be sexual abuse befalling children at it worries when it goes unreported. Nonetheless, divorce affects children in a varied number of ways of which is not limited to the juveniles feeling free to engage in unscrupulous behavior. At school children are expected to learn some common basics in regards to academic goals, personal vision and how they should behave in a civic manner. Conversely, with undesired curriculum schools might fall short of these objectives.

There are known gang characteristic as per the description of miller and it is common among most of the gangs. They crop up courtesy of bonding after erroneous act of crime has been committed. To reduce gang formation, school improvements, building recreational centers and tapping employments opportunities is primary deterrence technique. If this fails the secondary measures are in place to safeguard gang outspread. Consequently, gangs are motivated by drug use, the laws governing the adults and children should be different since maturity and rational decision differs by far. The effects are far much worse too, lung cancer, school dropouts and addiction might be succumbed at last. A prevailing influence of peer pressure has long been known to cause youth abuse of substance as external factors whilst genetic are internal drug misuse factors. As far as selling of drugs by youths are concerned impacts are punitive even though not compared to adults but in the long run youths would opt to depend on It to support their habits. Substance abuse deterrence exertions are strategized to help youths avoid drugs in accordance to their different levels of risks. Inspirations, detoxification and life style modification are critical factors that may impede efficacious drug cure.