Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Consider the Hobby Lobby  case. Should for-profit corporations be entitled to the protections that individuals have to freely exercise their religion? How can a for-profit corporation have a religious identity? Is it the religious belief of the majority shareholder/owner/CEO? The entire corporate board? What if the exercise of religion, like in the above-mentioned case, only affects one gender? Is the ambiguous religious identity of a corporation more important than private reproductive decisions of all women working for said corporation? What if the exercising of the corporation's religious beliefs is less about religion and more about political dissent? Should women have to bear the burden of corporate political activism? Having garnered protection from the Supreme Court, should corporations be made to inform employees or potential employees that they will not cover birth control due to the corporation’s religious beliefs? Should corporations that rely on the Hobby Lobby ruling be prevented from covering drugs such as a Viagra to unmarried men? Does the fact that Hobby Lobby covered birth control before the implementation of ACA change your views?