Recent history
Q1. Pacific Relations
The current policy of the U.S is on the basis of the necessity that is hugely seen in the largest part of the Asia- Pacific area for the planned comfort in the aspect of an increasing emphatic China. This connection is also determined by the yearning to encourage the American associates, networks and other republics in that area in which the U. S has not been beaten after a year of the combat. The U.S has not been debilitated by the financial and radical difficulties at home and still it is not going to extricate from the Asia- Pacific relationships. The main aims of the fresh rule of the United States are to widen the areas of the collaboration valuable to the America with the local areas and the organizations reinforce the American supporters’ affairs and the partners such as great authorities as China and India (Lee, Allison, Blackwill & Wyne, 2012).
This is to advance the regional standards and the rules attuned with the global safety, financial and radical order which is widely reinforced by the U.S. Based on policy, the main features that have shaped the relationship involve three sets of incentives such as safety, financial and political elements. Alternations in the American army construction are well seen and have involved abundant responsiveness. The U.S is ever-changing considerable armed volumes from other theatres of action to the Asia- Pacific and rearrangement of its local safety preparations to produce more extensively discrete U.S services through the area. This has entailed a great outline of the novel armed dispositions to Australia and the Philippines and has been convoyed by prolonged safety preparations with local associates which accentuate a wider armed incorporation (Lee, Allison, Blackwill & Wyne, 2012).
The financial status of the policy has also improved the relationship between the two regions and this is objected in expanding the mutual and multifaceted financial relation between America and the area. The Obama government has started a process that will improve the overseas support to the Asia- Pacific region. Finally the political elements have improved the relationship of these regions. The U. S political structure involvement has intricate consolidation on the United States corporations and structuring profounder associations with associates such as India and Singapore, thus extending the commitment with the joint organizations and running the U.S – China connection. Countries in the Asian region such as China and Vietnam have taken important phases to advance their affairs with the U. S in the current centuries. While the administrations in these republics have been much cautious in maintaining their close financial connections with China and to evade antisocial problems in the region’ s increasing power, they have established it planned to put themselves to the universal’s most noticeable global force. These republics that have overtly reinforced and incorporated the U.S connection to the Asia- Pacific are most likely to be inspired by the anxieties over China than by the inherent petition of the U.S rules (Lee, Allison, Blackwill & Wyne, 2012).
Q2. Leadership
Theodore Roosevelt is one leader in America seen to have positive impacts in the country. He has a notion that a leader should have a unique relationship with all the responsibility to the people. Through these notions, he wanted to challenge the upcoming ideas of the limited government and individualism thus maintained and served as a leader to reform the people of America. He is a leader who had many wishes to make a fair society which is more reasonable with the financial possibilities for all Americans. He supposed that the administration had the right and the accountability to control large businesses so that its impacts would not harmfully distress the public. Based on his presidential style, he introduced personality into the radical equality. He maintained a strong relationship with the community and he was aware on how to use mass media to outline the public view. He was the paramount leader whose voting was more personal than the radical party. As a prominent leader, he used his passion to gain ballots, form subjects and develop views which made him change his policymaking organization forever (Giuliani & Kurson, 1998).
Bill Clinton was another leader who was able to reconstruct the appearance and the processes of the Self-governing movement in ways that successfully destabilized the Reagan Rebellion. His leadership is well known for its national achievement as he removed the federal shortfall and administered the strongest financial status in the recent memory. Based on financial globalization, he developed new governments of free trade. Woodrow Wilson was another successful leader in the American society. He left a lasting inheritance as he transformed the main aim of the American foreign policy from neglect to globalism. He had the ability to modify and assemble the public opinion which formed the modern presidency (Giuliani & Kurson, 1998).
When leadership in heritage is defined as the influence on the nation and future politics, these leaders recognized its importance. Based on these leaders, we learn several lessons on how to choose prominent leaders. If a person minds about the American economic status, the only option is to vote for the candidates that will advance industrialization in the States. If industrialization in America is advanced, then America’s economy will increase. Manufactures are also helping the United States to remain the global economic leader. It is true that America cannot continue to be the most prominent in the global market without the best leaders. It is too wrong when you find other leaders deceiving ecological policies that are diminishing our energy options. As Americans, it is time to renovate our rules, swap unsuccessful and duplicative rules and follow policies that are suppler and less strict. Strengthening our substructure is the main reason as to why we choose good leaders. Thus it is essential to reinforce our country by associating with leaders who show their pledge to industrialization and other essential values (Giuliani & Kurson, 1998).
Themes
Q3. Government
The expanded role of the national government has created significant changes in our economic system in America. The national government in many ways has saturated the lives of many Americans. For instance, the national government taxes consume more than a quarter of the national manufacture and are charged mostly on work, inventiveness and wealth buildup. The federal government also competes with the private business sectors as it operates on many commercial industries. In the financial section, there are many federal covering sections such as farming, overseas trade and asset. The role of the national government in the local economy can be sponsored and distributed at the state or the local levels. If the involved was to be delimited by the parliament authority over regional cornmerce, an authority would be given to the parliament by the founders for the aim of preventing the federal government from involving with the trade (Welch, 2009).
Through expanding its role in the Americans life, the federal government has recognized the tendency of the governments to grow, thus it has added the Bill of rights to the constitution as a way of the protection of the rights of the individuals against the state. Based on expanding the America’s life, the national government has expanded the restrictions that have been set by the constitution initiators. Thus the federal government must be readdressed to its proper and sincere role for the Americans. The abundant humanity has conventional databases in the U. S in which the main aim of the strategies is the abolition of scarcity and ethnic unfairness. Johnson a president in America used the society and addressed programs such as education, medical, poverty, urban problems and transportation. These programs and their initiatives were supported by his followers. The intentions of these plans as proposed by the national government is to refine the aims and plans to reflect the changing challenges and priorities of the American Society (Welch, 2009).
The growth of the American Government has affected the lives of Americans as it was never supposed to involve in the activities that it is currently doing. When the United States gained its freedom many years ago, the formation fathers proposed a federal government with obvious and controlled errands. These errands were proposed for the protection of the security of the state and maintaining the public safety. The less that the federal government has involved in the national economy would be funded and conveyed at the state and the national levels. The bill of rights was to make sure that the government would never grow so large that it could crush on the individual and economic freedoms of the American inhabitants. This freedom is wearing away as the U.S has been changed from a nation that does not involve the government in the marketplace. This is now making the government main actors in the national economy. The American government has expanded the restrictions that were set by the constitution founders, thus the growth of the government has created the greatest tragedy of the twentieth century (Welch, 2009).
Q4. Women
Women have always had a powerful role in the success and the development of the American community. These roles vary depending on time and era, ecology and people’s race. The American female’s starring role was much pretentious by the establishment of captivity. Women, who would not meet the expense of the slave help, were placed into the domestic obligations. The women in captivity worked in the gardens throughout the daytime and cooked food for their families. Those women in the 16th century had great roles in their communities as they performed traditional roles. When colonizers emanated to the new universe, they remained attracted to comprehend how the Innate Americans organized all the labor-intensive and outmoded level. Women role to the growth of the Americans has changed in the recent times although these roles have not been easy to the American women (Belasen, 2012). Currently, only the wealthy has fewer roles to complete their work. Actually, women had a major role in forming the American material that happens today. They have revealed to us that to toil in order to feed their families through hardships. The viewpoint of women developing in each period mostly in the Second World War has viewed women and growth based on a theoretical and practical approach to development. The perspectives of the women development seeks to understand the women issues on the existing genders to place women in different subsidiary levels. The growth of women expanded in the 1970’s where they called for employment chances that would increase the programs that were meant to give the productive labor of women leaving away the focus of communal well-being. The development of women in each era faced a lot of problems as some of their approaches had surplus costs of representing women as a unit whose entitlements are restricted on its productive value (Belasen, 2012).
The development of women was entitled on the women role in the growth of the community and focus on the boundaries of communities’ transformation. While there was a perspective that development was a loom to advance women. There was a notion that suggested that the development was only made possible by the women involving themselves in the development projects. Women in earlier times attained important improvements. Their most tangible victory was the passage of the 19th amendment that was reasoned to empower women. Women in the society had many traditional roles which was mainly supporting her husband. During the earlier times, many women lived in the rural areas where they were involved in work farms. Currently, the traditional women would have a negative approach to the new time women who have found it hard to develop trade in their societies. The women life is viewed as better since the days that the female protesters harmonized in the streets for equality to find their freedom for social values and career (Belasen, 2012).
Q5. Environment
Our relationship with the natural environment in the modern America has changed. The cultural variations of the humans have permitted the humans to take over each environment type in the universe. Because their manner of acquiring food involves the handling of the natural environments, the early agricultural societies seem to have huge negative influences on the natural environment. Areas that were used to produce the wanted crops do not upkeep the full types that are counterpart of the natural surroundings of the plants. Assessing how developments in the modern American have been approached based on the natural environment, it is clear that the preservation of the natural areas on uplifting urbanization is a common challenge for the conservation (Dunaway, 2007).
The quick growth in population and land development has been connected in many American countries to put unembellished weight on the natural systems. In U.S, the continuing developments have been the most significant factors that have been affecting the natural ecosystem and the cause of environment loss and sorts endangerment in U.S. The national sector has considered the growing awareness and the focus of the social, financial and environmental costs of the continuing development by establishing a wide range of policy which is effectively made to manage the growth of urban areas (Dunaway, 2007).
The loss of environment has been approaches as the main cause of species endangerment in America. Urbanization growth is also leading to the habitat loss which entails a thorough transformation from the financial nature to the human economy. Urbanization growth will continue to be the function of economic growth while the notion of the natural preservation shows that the most competitive exclusions happen in the urban areas (Dunaway, 2007).
Reference
Belasen, A. T. (2012). Developing women leaders in corporate America: Balancing competing demands, transcending traditional boundaries. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger.
Dunaway, F. (2007). Natural visions: The power of images in American environmental reform. Chicago, Ill. [u.a.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Giuliani, R. W., & Kurson, K. (1998). Leadership. New York: Hyperion.
Lee, K. Y., Allison, G. T., Blackwill, R. D., & Wyne, A. (2012). Lee Kuan Yew: The grand master's insights on China, the United States, and the world.
Welch, S. (2009). Understanding American government: The essentials. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
