Neiburg states that there should be combined effort from the locals and the national government to build museum exhibits and hold conferences in commemoration of the world war one victims. If this is already done, the anniversaries should not go unnoticed. Combined efforts from the local and the national government will ensures that there is funding from both levels of government It also makes the effort holistic and inclusive in the study of the war. Inclusivity and consistency is key while studying world war one, an event that occurred a hundred years ago and makes it more memorable and meaningful than just building museums, memorials and statues whose message fade with time. In spite of the combined effort one of the worries is, does keeping the world war one memories alive good enough to help avert the same scenario in the unforeseen future? (Neiberg, 2016). 

Studying of the world war one turns the event into a political topic that gains traction and adapts into the domestic context of any country, as its effects were vast, therefore it remains relevant as a topic of discussion. The sentiments above are correct and can shape the world politics to be tolerable to diplomatic ways of solving issues in the today’s politics. Although today’s politics have their own bearing making them different  from history, human character remains constant and the question still remains, can world war one be used to dictate today’s political views? (Neiberg, 2016). 

Studying the war, gives the chance to not only remember the brave men who fought in the war but also the chance to revisit   the true purpose of the war and not just the presented purpose version. While studying the war, different viewpoints usually arise, which allows for further discussion and research and the details that come out in the open are subject to scrutiny. The details can explain how different countries were affected by the war than others and explain their attitude and international relations with in other countries. Information from this war can change the attitude people may have towards both the victims and the perceived perpetrators of the war and encourage a more policy driven agenda that will change foreign policies. Although it sound doubtful, can the laws and policies be generated from world war one be neutral and fair? (Neiberg, 2016). 

 

 

 

REFERENCEs

 Neiberg, M. S. (2016). The path to war: How the First World War created modern America.