Weapons of Mass Destruction
Q1
A bludgeon of mass demolition can be defined as a nuclear, radiological, compound, natural or any other kind of mace that can kill and cause a huge harm to many people and cause them a huge damage to human made constructions such as buildings or the biosphere. They can also be defined as weapons that may produce shocking outcomes when set free in a single strike (Busch & Joyner, 2009).
Q2
According to the sanctions that were against the foreigners which were executed under order EO 12938, President Clinton declared a state emergency based on the increase of the nuclear, natural and compound weapons and many ways of delivering them. The executive order 12938 forbids the importation of goods, knowledge or the services that were innovated or given by the foreigners in that the state secretary had resolute to impose an importation denial due to their weapons of mass destruction increased activities. The executive order had been adjusted twice with the aim of making it more effective as it would fight the spread of alternative weapons. President Obama later founded the increased spread of chemical, nuclear and natural weapons as a national urgent situation (Busch & Joyner, 2009).
Q3
Counter proliferation is the diplomatic, intelligence and the military efforts to fight the increase of weapons such as the weapons used for the mass destruction. In contrast, the weapons of mass destruction focused on the political, legal and the administrative measures. It can be referred to as a main control which would eradicate the conflict between two nations thus preventing the arming of one nation against the other. This helped in the provision of cushion of time before the infinitesimal bomb. The counter proliferation focused on the intelligence, law enforcement and sometimes the military in action thus preventing the possession (Schreier, 2009).
Q4
The main strategy for the countering weapons of mass destruction such as their use and more increase is an essential component of the national security of the United States. As done on the war of terrorism, the American plan of the home security and the new approach of deterrence, the American concept to fight the WMD replicates a huge amendment from the past. Thus to succeed on this, the state must take the current chances such as the use of the new technologies and increased focus on the intelligence (Schreier, 2009).
Weapons of mass destruction could make it able for the opponents to impose huge harm on the United States where the military forces associates. Military weapons are intended to overcome the American advantages in the conservative forces and to restrict them from responding to violence against the friends and the partners in the region of vital interest. Moreover, terrorists are looking to have WMD with the stated need of killing a large number of people without any compunction or warning.
The American government has decided not to allow the most dangerous terrorists to threaten the world with the most critical weapons. Thus they are having the highest degree main concern to protect the States, the forces and the partners from the existing and ongoing WMD threat (Schreier, 2009).
Q5
The WMD pose a threat to the United States as they have occupied the center of politics globally. They have the possibility of a huge destruction and the random nature against the civilians. While the murder of humans is not a new factor of warfare, the weapons that are for mass destruction pose challenges to the peace and security of the Americans. These increased threats and increase stockpiles of WMD problems are caused by the wide spread of WMD and some connected innovations to some countries, black market sales of weapons and related modernization (Busch & Joyner, 2009).
Reference
Busch, N. E., & Joyner, D. (2009). Combating weapons of mass destruction: The future of international nonproliferation policy. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Schreier, F. (2009). WMD proliferation: Reforming the security sector to meet the threat. Washington, D.C: Potomac Books.