Reflective Essay: In Defense of Politics

Personally, I agree with the definition of politics and the dangers that Crick views in regard to nationalism, technology, and democracy.  There are always limits to achieving anything.  Given that politics can adequately be able to maintain its firmness it can sustain its youthfulness and strong nature. However, the modern environment changes and varies highly and individuals have so much to accomplish based on their numerous ideas and therefore this pressures the anticipation of the future.  In an equal state, politics can never be an immediate and completely practical activity as politicians must act in regard to the future.  In most cases, politics is defined as a poor association, naturally needy and auxiliary.  In rare cases, politics is given the praises as an activity that is independent and in high existence. Crick, (1993), defines politics as the primary activity where the opposing interests within a certain rule unit are reconciled by offering them an authority share in the quantity of their significance towards survival and the general welfare of the community.

Politics is dissimilar to religion, science, morals, economy or even law. Politics does not have the ability to solve all the existing issues and its presence is not in every location. According to Crick, (1993), politics is not a single political policy like nationalism, liberalism, conservatism and socialism despite the fact that it may contain some of the elements.  In other words, politics has no other definition other than being just politics which should be accounted individually and not on the real basis of it being highly respectable. Politics normally permits different kinds of authority within a community to establish a justifiable state of support and tolerance.  The need to coerce rises when the interest of a particular group gets the sensation that it has no survival desires with the other.  Political rule is then generated from the diversity issue and politics does not attempt to ensure that all thins become a single unit because it is mainly objected on creating as well as permitting a certain level of freedom. Rather than the perception held that political liberation is the persuasion for the government to serve in a tolerant way political freedom is basically a response to the needs of the government.  The freedom of a particular group can best be achieved when its authority is undeniable.  the example for this which is given by  Crick, (1993), is that the American revolution did not occur because individuals had suddenly gain the sensitivity  of their right or because nationalism had occurred  but this was influenced by the break  of the existing  government.  The government failed in recognizing the group’s interests certainly because the representation was low.

It is true that politics requires the protection of democracy, nationalism as well as technology. Concisely, in the sense that all the accurate, clear, reliable and practical thoughts require a defense against unfocused and indistinct matters.  Democracy, nationalism, and technology are social movements in the whole modern society as their grounds are well formed in politics but if utilized as essential principle destruction will certainly be achieved in politics.  Democracy is highly known to be the state of having more choices and equality in place. According to Crick, (1993) politics in nature is complex, messy and not close to perfection since it has so much to achieve.  This is true since politics cannot be similar to nationalism, ideology, democracy as well as technology which hold different goals and perspectives. For instance, democracy was more meaningful in Britain prior to 1914 as it implied that individuals held more economic, educational social and political opportunities (Crick, 1993).  Despite the fact that it is a free society it failed to sustain its political democracy since this proved to be a hard task.

Nationalism is a more challenging assertion in comparison to democracy.  Currently, among all the persuading motives nationalism stands to be the best that can convince a person to abandon politics.  One cannot argue the belief of individuals on their nation and most individuals who prefer to get oppression from their individual state rather than from foreigners (Crick, 1993).  Nationalism and democracy motto are particularly utilized for the maximum benefits of the government.  Nationalism has risen to be a political structure necessity which has hindered the ability of politics in a great way (Crick, 1993).  Nationalism and democracy inclusion in politics posse’s danger to development as the subjects pretend to be supplying benefits while subjecting more power to fulfill the interests of the government.

Crick’s thoughts and concerns can directly be related to the actual actions and directions of President Trump’s administration. Trump is utilizing the slogans of nationalism as well as democracy in fulfilling his promises to the citizen which is somehow wrong.  For instance, through the nationalism motto, the President is working of limiting immigration which is among the interest of those that considers themselves as nationalists. Crick states that nationalism holds no special association to either political injustice or justice but its prejudiced authority cannot be denied (Crick, 1993). The administration of Trump is considered to be based on racism to many but Crick states that nationalism is dissimilar to race. For instance, Crick states that U.A, Britain, Sweden and Holland are among the states with patriotic and legal grounds that were developed prior to the rise of racism and nationalism which creates the difficult political climates in the states. For instance, according to Crick Canada present a more accurate case that nationalism cannot be considered to be a national unity precondition (Crick, 1993). The 1867 unifications motivation were economic and military based and its success was mainly influenced by the existing political establishments.

It is true that there is a higher danger that is posed to politics with the desire of being certain at any given cost. Technology is utilized as a form of developing critical thoughts which are not a necessity in politics. Technology use in politics is aimed at restructuring politics in all levels through the generation and application of scientific knowledge in running a society. Technology endangers politics as it attempts to reduce the political issues to science by assuming that all subjects are practical. Politics should be independent fully from all the existing influences as science can result in conflict thus resulting in drastic consequences (Crick, 1993).

In conclusion, I agree with Crick that politics is the procedure of reconciling the opposing thoughts by offering a portion of authority that is based on their significance towards societal growth.  In addition, politics should be free all development elements such as nationalism, technology, and democracy as it is an independent thing.  Nationalism, as well as democracy, is utilized in government administration as a way of persuasion but they are mainly objected at exercising the authority and interests of the government which is similar to the administration of President Trump. This poses danger as the opposing ideas are not well represented.  On the other hand, technology endangers politics by attempting to decrease its ability to science.

 

 

 

 

 

            Reference

Crick, B. (1993). In defence of politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.