Campaigns for Health & the Environment
Introduction
My anti-text-driving campaign will engage Drexel university students as the target audience. The target audiences were chosen based on analyzing their text driving habits and the motive behind the conduct. Drexel university students and all students in general have the tendency of arriving to class late which is mostly influenced by individual’s lifestyles, peer pressure and peer beliefs. As youths they are highly engaged in directing messaging and the addiction cannot be avoided even while driving. Most of the students drives speedily to school to catch up with the class progress which they are already late for. In the case of driving and texting they are likely to be engaged in accidents since text driving can best be categorized as blind driving (Richtel 1). The goal of the campaign is therefore to demonstrate to the students that text driving is not a form of competence but rather than ignorance.
Test-driving Issue and Facts
Road accidents deaths and damages are on the rise currently and most of the cases reports states that the victims were texting actively while driving (Richtel 1). Texting can wait since most of the conversations are just based on not emergency or justifications (Richtel 1). The problem is that despite the increased campaigns to warn youths about text driving the tendency has not stopped. The campaign is aimed directly at transforming the general attitudes of students towards text driving but illustrating how it can affect their lifestyles and that of the loved ones. The objective of the campaign is to ensure that text driving accidents among students is reduced drastically. This will be achieved through offering education on the activity’s danger on road users to obtain a positive attitude.
Social Norm Theory and Its Application in the Campaign
Social norms theory is mainly utilized in the description of different situations that individuals or peers utilize and the general community which differs from their unique beliefs despite knowing that it is not good (Schneider, Gruman and Coutts 75). Most of the assumption that the individuals utilize are directly related to risky and problematic conducts in regard health and the surrounding. The theory was utilized in the campaign in analyzing why Drexel students choose to text drive despite the fact that they understand it’s not right and it is a risk. It was established that it was because of the peer pressure. In that, text driving to most youths is assumed to be a form of expertise and everyone wants to show case that they can. This is however not true based on the involved risks and it is not a form of profession since if it was it should have acquired a place in learning. With the rise of countless campaigns against the act students understand that it is not right since this is a dangerous engagement. After developing awareness of the issue among the target audience based on the theory individuals should be left in order to make theory personal changes in regard to settling for the right beliefs rather than popular misconceptions (Schneider, Gruman and Coutts 76).
In order for efficiency to be achieved from the campaign the students were challenged to make an analysis of the text driving benefits which there was none as compared to the severe implications. Those that were against the campaign based on their peer beliefs were the primary priority as a change of attitude was highly required. This was achieved through target sampling or segmentation that was based on demographic details encompassing age, gender, attitude, preferences and behaviors. This strategy was adopted to ensure that all the significant students demography that was essential in the case was captured to ensure that those that desire to text drive and those who actively and positively do it are involved.
Formative Process
Data collection was achieved through interviews as well as questionnaires since the tools are characterized with fast collection speed, efficiency, reliability, cost efficiency as well as the capability to maximize the collected information. The utilized formative assessment was based on impact, outcome and the campaign process. This involved measuring the perception of the students about the issue, the reach of the campaign, the capability to affect changes in social norms, attitudes or their beliefs and whether the objective of the campaign had been obtained. The formative assessments tools included self evaluations, conversations and analyzing during data collection. The results indicated that students engages in text driving due to peer force and the need to fit in the group. The effectiveness of the campaign was thus established as the students attitudes transformed gradually by establishing that it was more beneficial not to text drive in saving persons lives. The campaigns plans were however, limited by funds time and the willingness of individuals to fully participate in the campaign. This slowed down the timeline since much effort in convincing and persuading audiences was a major necessity.
Campaign Implementation
Based on the 4P’s strategies, the products utilized in the campaign are blogging, partnership, public report, picture competition, Facebook, twitter and website posting. The budget was 1560 dollars for all the products with promotion being achieved using email marketing, video marketing, direct messaging, search engines and public relations. In order to appeal full to the target audiences the primary campaign event occurred during the orientation week based on the convenience. Negative attitude and the uneasiness of students to make their participation as the primary barriers were utilized in aligning the objectives, benefits and limitations for maximum gain.
Work Cited
Schneider, Frank W, Jamie A. Gruman, and Larry M. Coutts. Applied Social Psychology: Understanding and Addressing Social and Practical Problems. Los Angeles: Sage, 2012. Print.
Richtel, Matt. Trying To Hit The Brake On Texting While Driving. 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/business/trying-to-hit-the-brake-on-texting-while-driving.html
Richtel, Matt. In Study, Texting Rising Crashes 23 Times Higher. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/technology/28texting.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=A803E945B16757356B7351387E223CC8&gwt=pay