Theories, Key Concepts, and Tactics Used in Macro-Resistance
Theoretical Framework
Resistance is a complex social phenomenon that can involve a wide range of behaviors and actions. It has been viewed as a representative of hope as well as a trite idea that is used to legitimize the consumptive practices of the rebels. Macro-resistance is a form of resistance that emphasizes the issues of power and inequality at the official level in society. Macro-resistance features contribute to the increase of inhabitants deviants in the community. Once accessing the institutional way that holds up social goals is constrained, the populace size of conformists declines whereas the populace size of deviants upsurges. The inclined constraints on access are most possible instigated by a greater degree of defiance to altering institutional exercises. Alteration in these exercises is required to adapt to variations in the societal and commercial certainties and the failure to adapt results in suboptimal performance (Lassiter et al, 2018). For that reason, a higher percentage of resistance to transformation means that institutions are acting at a suboptimal level. Lower presentation hinders the development of safe social settings, required for persons to turn into conformists and be able to access the required properties. Resistance to transformation plays a part in controlling marginalization whereby it is speculated that diversity has a significant part in the perviousness of class borders. At the macro level, a member of a subculture may bring together a group of people to resist a mutual societal ideology together. The aim of bringing them together is to offer support to struggles that other people are facing or create political change.
Literature Review
According to Lassiter et al, (2018) marginalization is the least access to institutional ways of achieving social goals. Marginalized individuals have constrained access to resources such as schools and hospitals. Being culturally diverse and resisting to transform are some of the macro-level situations that have an impact on marginalization. Macro conditions that are more favorable to the development of marginalized groups are great institutional defiance to transformation and low ethnic diversity. Five groups in society are a representation of bigger and smaller marginalized groups of people. These groups are the “conformists, innovators, ritualists, retreatists, and the rebels”. The conformists are persons who have accepted the conventional ethnic goals and can access the institutional ways fully to attain the goals. Persons that cannot access the institutional ways but still hold their ethnic goals may find other means which may even be illegal to achieve these goals and these happen to be the innovators. The ritualists have access to genuine ways but insufficient to achieve their ethnic goals. The retreatists who retreat from taking part in the society have slight access to institutional ways and do not accept governing ethnic goals. The rebels are individuals who reject genuine ways and conformist ethnic goals in place of their own goals which they achieve by developing their ways. Rebels also abandon their community to follow goals and ways that are not available in their community. Recently the ritualists and retreatists have been placed in one group called the deviants because they both include persons and actions that move away from the normal ethnic rules and practices. The deviants are at a high possibility of being marginalized in the society they live in.
The macro-level theory is among the first to truly sociologically explain the causes of deviant behavior. It strives for understanding deviance by putting more focus on the social structure and forms that arise as persons and groups respond to circumstances that they cannot regulate or those that they have little control over (Featherstone & Deflem, 2003). Macro theory creates the notion that societal imperative is the product of an interrelated set of rules and that these rules are shared by the society and that deviance and how the society responds to deviance is necessary to maintaining order. Social assimilation and social transformation are the main aspects of deviant behavior. When a community goes through a rapid transformation, values become uncertain and the society is not able to control the behaviors of its members. Human beings cannot live happily if their needs are insufficiently proportioned to their means. Deviance occurs when there is a breakdown in the regulation of goals which makes the individual’s aspirations and expectations limited. In a stable society, most individuals are content with their positions or only aspire to accomplish only what is realistically possible for them to accomplish.
Another argument in the macro-level theory is that illegal and deviant conduct is learned just like any other conduct and not every person has a similar opportunity to study criminal expertise and have criminal occupations. This was particularly focused on the criminal gangs and the circumstances in which these gangs came about. Still, on the macro-level theory, more focus was placed on the neighborhood conditions and opportunities available to learn and get involved in legitimate or illegitimate skills. Results showed that in neighborhoods that crime thrived as an established institution, they were fruitful criminal learning settings for young people (Brezina, 2012). The forms of illegitimate prospects that are accessible in the underprivileged regions led to three forms of criminal subgroups which are “criminal, conflict, and retreatist”. Being that the concentration was placed more on the underprivileged regions, it is assumed that the youth that grows in these areas will have a deprived and insufficient genuine opportunity to be successful. Therefore, the accessibility of unlawful prospects becomes significant in modeling the deviance that happens in these regions. Criminal subcultures develop amongst adolescent boys in neighborhoods that are characterized by systematic, organized crime that provides an outlet in illegal employment for them and illegitimately obtain wealth. The successful criminals act as role models for the upcoming criminals and in this way through social learning, the young boys acquire skills and norms to take advantage of illegitimate opportunities. Conflict subcultures develop in communities that are not organized and illegitimate opportunities rarely exist and those that exist are mainly for the adults. Such communities are categorized by social instability and the young people growing in these communities are not allowed to access legitimate and illegitimate opportunities. When they are denied access to these opportunities, they become frustrated and become violent in order to show their value. Retreatist subgroups are related to drug usage and the drug culture that exists in the lower class of young adults. These young adults are termed as double failures since they cannot fit in the conflict or criminal subculture. They withdraw from society and retreat to using drugs and isolating themselves.
Macro-Resistance
According to Williams (2011), there is a difference between the middle class and working-class subcultures in the way they socially position their acts of resistance. For young people, resistance is an active part of their lives and this brings to our attention the supposition that some subcultures are embedded in class structures. Resistance does not need formal or political demonstrations to be macro-oriented. Among the straightedge youths, refraining themselves from mass cultural practices such as sex and drugs as part of a visible political direction towards a level change in the society. Some straightedges who self-identify themselves as being members of social justice and environmental movements are actively engaged in public demonstrations and other collective actions that are micro-oriented. However, a subcultural theory has failed to frame youth subcultures as movers of the macro-social change and have left the task to new social movements. The reason for this could be that the social movement theories have conceptualized the macro-resistance better.
The concept of subculture in macro theory has been used as a means of comprehending significant action and identity formation as a sequence of exercises both as an individual and a combined level. Deviance was viewed as a usual reaction by normal persons to their knowledge of social detachments and a deviant is an associate of the community. Some of the studies show that drugs were perceived to be a societal evil that corrupts the youth and makes them commit a crime and engage in careless behaviors. The person using the drugs is referred to as an inhuman who can only survive in subgroups (Blackman, 2004). A subcultural action is more about bringing back rules to the youth and a subgroup’s deviance builds up its inner group interrelations, forms harmony, and keeps order. Deviance is a result of an interaction of values and assembly in the society and persons who do not have the same social class places in the social arrangement have different opportunities of comprehending the mutual principles of being successful. This condition creates deviance depending on how a person will adapt to their aim of success. The social chain of command is another cause of organizational tension for a person. Studies show that the youths who did not adapt to the norms which were acquiring the success objectives through institutional ways were regarded as not part of the community and were regarded as deviant foreigners. The functionalist model of subgroup saw as if drugs were evolving from subculture and drugs were seen as an issue and threat to society. Another cause of delinquency for the youth that has been highlighted is the idea that maternal deprivation caused the youth to commit a crime. This argument maintained that when a child is separated from his mother during the first five years, they develop a delinquent character.
Macro-level, such as the public policy is the center of all the dynamics in a society. The public rule is part of the macro-level theory and determines the properties that happen every day and drive the course of behavior and development. Macro-level speaks of the general cultural, past, and commercial arrangements of the society. This is where gender inequality, lack of recognition for the children’s rights, diversity, and all other forms of discrimination belongs. The law is a macro factor that refers to some acts of violence as more serious and important and treats others as if they do not deserve approval. Gender inequality has had some societies have extreme gender inequalities while others have more equality between men and women (Garner & Hancock, 2014). The characteristics of gender inequality are associated with the modes of production, forms of the state, social structures, and inheritance systems. The increase of women's movements can be explained in terms of the macro-level theory that associates the acts of the women to industrialization and their entry into the labor force and being able to get the managerial posts. Another theme that exists in the study of gender inequality is the use of women's perspectives to understand society and institutions. This calls for the experiences and actions of women being placed at the center of social analysis which will help in understanding the society more broadly.
The hierarchical organization of persons and groups in society determines their social class. A social class is determined by their wealth, educational achievement, and their income among other things. The social classes bring rise to inequality since there are underprivileged people in society as well. Inequality occurs when a person’s class in the social order is connected to different access to possessions. The main determiner of inequality is a person’s wealth and possession (Griffiths & Arnove, 2015). Race and gender are other factors that contribute to the imbalanced sharing of resources, prospects, and freedoms. Different sociologists have explained why discrimination exists from a worldwide perspective using different theories. The “theory of development and modernization” has been used to maintain that the reason the underprivileged countries remain underprivileged is for the reason that they still cling on to the traditional beliefs and institutions. The dependency theory blames the continued commercial reliance on past foreign nations for international stratification. They argue that nations are developing unevenly because the prosperous nations have oppressed the underprivileged nations previously and recently through foreign dues. The way to reverse inequality according to the dependency theory is to let go of the earlier debts so that the countries can make some profit from their incomes. The “world-systems theory” maintains that all countries are alienated into a three-tier order founded on their interrelations with the international budget and the position of a nation in this order decides its commercial growth.
Conclusion
Macro-resistance is a form of resistance that emphasizes the issues of power and inequality at the public level in society. The factors of macro-resistance contribute to the increase of inhabitants deviants in the community. Conformists, innovators, ritualists, retreatists, and the rebels represent the bigger and smaller marginalized groups in society. The main factors of deviant behavior are social integration and social change. There are different arguments about deviant behavior where some say, it is adapted, others say it is learned through other people as a way of acquiring the illegitimate skills to get a job opportunity mostly in the poor communities which have led to the criminal, conflict and retreatist criminal subcultures. The concept of subculture in macro theory has been used to understand significant action and identify development as a sequence of exercises in both a single and a combined level. The macro-level is the overall ethnic, historic, and economic structures of society. Inequality, social class discrimination, lack of recognition all belong here. Some of the movements that people have engaged in have reduced inequality especially gender inequality.
References
Blackman, S. J. (2004). Chilling out: The cultural politics of substance consumption, youth and
drug policy. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Brezina, T. (2012). Anomie-strain theory. In Routledge Handbook of Deviant Behavior (pp. 123-
129). Routledge.
Featherstone, R., & Deflem, M. (2003). Anomie and strain: Context and consequences of
Merton's two theories. Sociological inquiry, 73(4), 471-489.
Griffiths, T. G., & Arnove, R. F. (2015). World culture in the capitalist world-system in
transition. Globalization, Societies and Education, 13(1), 88-108.
Garner, R., & Hancock, B. H. (2014). Social theory: A reader: continuity and confrontation.
Lassiter, C., Norasakkunkit, V., Shuman, B., & Toivonen, T. (2018). Diversity and Resistance to
Change: Macro Conditions for Marginalization in Post-industrial Societies. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00812
Williams, J. P. (2011). Subcultural theory: Traditions and concepts. Cambridge, UK: Polity
Press.
