Edudorm Facebook

The Concepts of Ethnic Conflict and Totalitarianism

The Concepts of Ethnic Conflict and Totalitarianism

Clarification of Political Leaders within a Totalitarian Framework

 Due to divergent political perspectives and the emerging nationalism, psychoanalytic specialists have tried to offer solutions to the ethnic conflicts and totalitarianism issues.  Most of the issues connected to political systems within the precepts are subject to social interaction. For instance, totalitarian administrative policies often highlight human liberty and uphold secrecy as a way of life. Within totalitarian communities, people normally aggravate toward aggressive mannerisms. Political leaders are perceived as figures to be feared and respected by all the people living within the society. As observed people are respectful and fearful towards them (Samadovich, 2020). The ethics and activities are normally perceived as unclear and hold no immediate meaning to the people living in a totalitarian regime. A paranoid-styled politician cannot tolerate anything else other than his or her point of view hence they reject information from other places. For example, in Uzbekistan people are deprived of the privilege such as holding gatherings and even communicating on matters pertaining the current stalemate between rival political camps. Hence, the exclusion leads elimination of socio-political matters and lifestyles. The importance of coming up with a system where the citizen is the servant to the politicians in power often creates enmity which might then lead to more political turmoil and hatred.

 There is always a connection existing between the political regimes and stabilization of a nation which in turn affects the communal groups belonging to both women men. Thus, political systems might often lead to the creation and generation of various societal groups at social points of comprehending the meaning and underlying interests of the political systems that tie the people to political systems of leadership. This cements the abuse of authority due to the dependence on political leaders (Kobyliński, 2020). Normally, assessing human nature tends to gravitate towards dynamics about power. In this context, one person might dominate other people and he cements the dominant relation through the integral issue which forms part of the society. Hence, dominations emerge from social relationships existing within a particular community. It is vital to note that domination over others might be used for a positive or negative cause. However, with time personality traits that harbor selfishness and greed crop into the system and this usually leads to an abusive relationship for their gains and interests. The mechanisms of withdrawing democratic ideals from the power are mainly due to ignorance among the people who live I that particular community.

Concepts of Ethnic Conflict

 International aspects of ethnic conflict are meant to shape the way each ethnic community views itself whenever compared to other people. This the main reason most people try to connect ethnic conflicts to global conflicts. The demonstration efforts to participate in this issue have often arisen various mechanisms of solving ethnic conflict within the communities. One of the issues that might lead to ethnic issues is political instability which is most likely to occur in most multi-ethnic communities the aim of investigating the dynamics surrounding ethnic conflict is to determine the immediate social context where these issues take place (Omelaenko, 2020). Through comparative analysis, one can gather more than just secondary information on the issue ailing the society afflicted by ethnic conflict. Most of the conceptual developments correlate with the realization of ethnic concept as a whole due to the infused and impact primary social events have on recent times. As most of the scholars state, ethnic groups might be conflicted due to various perspectives. Ethnic conflict continuously transforms into pertinent issues that revolve around modern-day societal matters. Since time immemorial people have lived in mixed societies hence they interact with more than one ethnicity in their lives. In the meantime, having a common racial and traditional background and mannerism is not enough to prevent ethnic conflict from taking place in the forms (Gach, 2020).  The severity of ethnic conflict lies with the sharing of resources and economic opportunities in a certain location. The gradual process of violence occurs due to one ethnic group fostering more power than other groups which in turn brings into light the widened gap between one ethnic group and another. For instance, when George Floyd was killed, black Americans claimed that slavery never ended and it only was altered into the criminal justice system which was unfair to minority ethnic groups. Through the community people, one can get a chance to interpret conflict either through regular conflict which normally exists within the community or through the mass accumulation of injustice that has been observed in a short period. One of the most notable issues in society is trying to practice multiculturalism whereby the government treats all the ethnic groups equally. Hence one ethnic group is not biased against another. Also, fairness is perceived through job opportunities and the maintenance of peace between two or more communities. If violence erupts in the community, the government should immediately deal with it more accurately and effectively.

 

 

References

Samadovich, M. K. (2020). Interpretation of Human and Political Leader in a Totalitarian System: Conception and Essence. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(8), 491-499.

Kobyliński, A. (2020). Just and Unjust Memory? The Moral Obligation to Remember All Victims of Wars and Totalitarian Regimes. Journal of Military Ethics, 19(2), 151-162.

Omelaenko, N. (2020, March). Basic Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Ethnic Conflict. In International Scientific Conference" Far East Con"(ISCFEC 2020) (pp. 21-25). Atlantis Press.

Gach, N. (2020). From totalitarianism to democracy: Building learner autonomy in Ukrainian higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 30(2), 532-554.

 

927 Words  3 Pages
Get in Touch

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to inform us and we will gladly take care of it.

Email us at support@edudorm.com Discounts

LOGIN
Busy loading action
  Working. Please Wait...