Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper instructions:
ARTICLE1
DISSECTING RESEARCH ARTICLES
In the next few activities, you will focus on developing the critical thinking skills associated with becoming a critical consumer of research literature. Through these learning experiences, you will be able to:
• Identify key research concepts.
• Utilize these research concepts to begin evaluating research articles more critically.
These critical thinking competencies are directly applicable to your coursework and to each aspect of the research process that you will continue to encounter as you advance in your program of studies. When you locate relevant existing research to support your research topic, your next step will be to evaluate what those articles:
• Contribute to your literature review.
• Contribute to your justification for your study.
These activities will help you develop basic skills in doing such evaluative reflection. Knowing how to evaluate research does not happen naturally. Throughout life, individuals make decisions about truth based on nonscientific methods. Examples of nonscientific evidence include:
• Opinions.
• Value judgments.
• Personal experiences.
• Unsupported assertions.
• Second-hand reports.
Therefore, learning to distinguish between nonscientific evidence and scientific evidence is a learning process that requires self-awareness and practice. As a graduate student, recognizing nonscientific methods and learning how to apply critical thinking skills to the dissection and evaluation of research articles is an essential tool for your educational success.
As you work through the material, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of quantitative and qualitative research methods and data analysis is not the objective. The focus is to help you achieve a basic understanding of key research concepts that form the foundation of the research process. This work will help you develop the foundation of knowledge and understanding that you will continue to build upon as you complete coursework in your doctoral program.
You will apply your knowledge of the research process:
• When reading research articles for your courses.
• When developing your Research Plan.
• When preparing your comprehensive exam papers.
As you continue in the transformational process to scholar-practitioner, you will become increasingly sophisticated in critically evaluating the claims of authors in research articles; and will be able to separate out scientifically verified claims from unsubstantiated claims. A research article describes the research design and the results of the study conducted. The objective of this unit is to help you develop basic skills in critically evaluating those results.
To complete the work on dissecting research articles, complete the following:
In the next two activities, Dissecting a Quantitative Article and Dissecting a Qualitative Article, you will read two research articles, referred to as Sample Article 1 and Sample Article 2, and then complete an evaluation of each. After completing the two article reading complete the quiz
• Sample Article 1 is an example of a quantitative research study.
• For Counseling, read Schoebi, Karney, and Bradbury's 2012 article, "Stability and Change in the First 10 Years of Marriage: Does Commitment Confer Benefits Beyond the Effects of Satisfaction?," from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, volume 102, issue 4, pages 729–742.
Review the Dissecting a Quantitative Article Scoring Guide to ensure that you have addressed all of the grading criteria in your assignment.
(I attached the article and the evaluation assignment)
(1page response/use Quantitative Article Scoring Guide to write paper )
