Case study on noise pollution

The issue in this case can be framed into a legal question for proper identification. Why are the streets of the neighborhood surged with noise yet it is unconstitutional? In order to analyze a case explicitly, correct issue identification is the most important. It follows a precise process of strategic steps. The first step involves a general question concerning the case. The next step requires the identification of necessary elements that can trigger of an action under the law. Thirdly, involves the application of the law elements to identify specific facts of the case. The last step requires the identifier to assemble the law elements and the key facts that have been raised in the preceding steps.

In this case, the solution is to hold every member of the community accountable of any noise produced contrary to the law. This calls the law enforcers to get on toes for the implementation of the law. It is an open fact that noise pollution has been prohibited in the constitution. It is also clear that the some of the citizens are ignorant of the law while the police officers have become reluctant in enforcing it. As a result the public points the blame towards the government for failing to arrest the law breakers.

In this regard, my recommendation is that the municipal council should write an ordinance. This is because an ordinance usually constitutes the subject matter of the municipal law. Based on this fact, a written ordinance would help in minimizing public noise as part of public safety (Robinson & Reilly, 2002).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

Top of Form

Robinson, N. A., & Reilly, K. (2002). Environmental regulation of real property. New York, N.Y: Law Journal Press.

Bottom of Form