Summary

            Ethical objectivism is described is the general view that the moral values, as well as values, exist as intrinsic and they are independent of everything. Based on ethical objectivism the laws of moral are external and they were not created because they are not subjected to any desire of being. Moral absolutism is a major form of ethical objectivism. On the other hand, moral skepticism is a collection of meth ethical concepts which holds that moral knowledge is not held by anyone. This concept additional emphasizes that moral knowledge does not live.

Ethical objectivism solves the issues of moral skepticism as it explains the general moral errors thus allowing every individual to develop moral imperfection. Ethical objectivism, therefore, helps individuals in developing moral decisions as moral mistakes are often committed without having the moral knowledge. Moral perfection is therefore achieved through ethical objectivism as it helps in developing moral standards that are genuine.   Ethical objectivism, therefore, does not state those things that are good and those that are evil or the views that are true but it provides specific answers that are generated by morals.  This, therefore, acts as moral doings guideline thus helping in reducing the occurrence of moral errors.

Ethical objectivism seems to be a false concept because of absolute ethical rules, as well as global ethical laws, are not present.  This is mainly because if the concept that ethical objectivism is real then moral laws must be absolute and ethical laws are universal and are shared among a set of individuals.

Moral disagreement is important because it helps in establishing of several concepts based on ethical laws.  This disagreement is additionally significant as it shows that if individuals hold different thoughts about the ethical objectivism theory then the theory are untrue it is a matter of opinions.

            In my opinion, moral disagreement is crucial because it helps in identifying the various conclusions that lie around the objectivist theory.  Objectivism acts as the direction of providing moral principles that show how individuals should act and why they should.

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

            Chapter 1: How Ethical Objectivism Solves the Problems of Moral Skepticism, Chapter 2: Universality, Objectivity, Absolutism, & Chapter 3: The (Un) Importance Of Moral Disagreement