Ethical Lens Inventory Findings
The overall ethical lens is the responsibility lens- mild in terms of rationality and autonomy. Personal reasoning skillsets are used to regulate one's daily principles through autonomy. The chief standards demonstrate that one prioritizes the indecision which exists between levelheadedness and sensibility together with autonomy and equality. In other, the primary values governing the day to day life are rationality and autonomy. For instance the prioritization of rationality values over sensibility. As an MR, the ability to commit to cautious thoughts is influenced by personal feelings as one finds the underlying truth of the matter. Thus, one might tend to frame the actual narrative of life-based on self-awareness and other accepted social norms (EthicsGame, 2021). In terms of autonomy, one mildly prioritizes respect for other people rather than finding grounds for creating equality. As MA, one wants to choose their path and other perspectives are externally influenced through the community of other people and life's sake. This is because from a communal perspective there are things that one needs not to do for the sake of keeping up with certain expectations which in the long run might affect their lives. More so, mild autonomy gives people the ability to choose their own life and make their own decisions for the sake of coming to terms with the outcome.
Ethical Theories Connected Associated With Mild Rationality and Mild Autonomy
One of the ethical theories connected to mild rationality and mild autonomy are virtue and deontological ethics. Virtue ethics promotes autonomy as it considers people living with each other in conducive public relations areas (Frischhut, 2019). Virtue ethics is normative in more than one way of coming up with specific solutions to challenges. For the sake of keeping up with more than one form of solution, humans tend to be more logical and responsive to things that are made up of reasoning than sensational sequences. For this reason, virtue ethics composes autonomous decisions making process and ensures people have practical wisdom on how to handle issues. More so, virtue ethics ensures that one attends to others as he or she would like them to do the same for them. For example, a virtuous person is more likely to develop personal talents for the benefit of others and also himself. For most people, virtue ethics dictate the course of action one might take whenever faced with a difficult decision. Thus, the moral perspective of a person will guide him or her through the entire decision-making process and also enhance the logical ways of thinking or advancing their thoughts.
Another theory connected to mild rationality and mild autonomy is the concept of deontological theory. Personal autonomy theory states that one has to have practical solutions to their challenges (Marković, & Bokan, 2017). Someone can only be deemed as autonomous if their decisions are respected. Whenever one meets a challenge, the decision made is considered the reflection of his personal life and state of his mind. The connection between deontology and autonomy is treating all the people with dignity and respect that they deserve no matter their viewpoint. Therefore, people define their responsibilities a then act on them through rationality.
Application of Mild Rationality and Mild Autonomy
Settling for the truth no matter the cost only makes it better whenever one encounters a dilemma between two opposing choices. An ethical position is meant to define principles that will then guide towards a specific action (Forcehimes, 2017). The primary focus is usually to build up towards truthful insights. First, in any situation, the heads give details which in turn are opened up for more evaluation. Ethical norms that one believes in are usually seen as the norm.
Applying Mild Rationality and Mild Autonomy to Leadership and Solving Challenges
Primary reasoning is used instead of emotions. Due to the logical steps required to reach a solution, the evaluation of information together with feelings ensures a logical and fairer way of arriving at a solution and leading other people. The reasoning combined with more than just one thought and action bring about informed. This often leads to self-management and could convince other people of one's leadership qualities (Marković, & Bokan, 2017). Even if one works with other people and comprehends their motives, a sense of duty always enables other people to follow through. This is because ethical boundaries dictate the direction one will take while dealing with most challenges. The underlying reasons for making a choice are vital for identifying principles and assessing intentions needed to determine agreed terms and conditions while keeping in place some of the most issues regarding authentic meaning.
In summary, the best way of solving challenges is through the combination of rationality and autonomy. It expands one perspective and gives one the ability to come to terms with acceptable principles one needed to apply while dealing with other people. The balance between rationality and sensibility eases commitment to upbringing and essential ways of acting towards a common good a considering others' disposition towards their feelings. Therefore, the main aim of these ethical lens inventory findings.
References
EthicsGame (2021). Ethicsgame.com. Retrieved 13 February 2021, from https://www.ethicsgame.com/Exec/Eli/EthicalLensResults.aspx?R=1.
Forcehimes, A. (2017). Ethical Theories and Their Application. Exploring Moral Problems: An Introductory Anthology, 2-48.
Frischhut, M. (2019). The ethical spirit of EU Law (p. 157). Springer Nature.
Marković, M., & Bokan, B. (2017). Instrument for verification of ethical theories in physical culture. Physical education and sport through the centuries, 4(1), 71-91.
