Electronic Surveillance

            I support the use of electronic surveillance of U.S. citizens without court orders in cases of suspected terrorist activities.  As the former president Bush commanded the National Security Agency to look for the proof on the radical movement deprived of the law court agreed permits that needed the local snooping rendering to the administration officers. There has also been the efficiency in the monitoring of the intelligence action on the global calls and the e-mail messages of many people.  The Americans use the electronic surveillance so as to track the numbers that were used by the Al Qaeda.  The American agency is also using permits to assess the whole internal communication. The main reason for my support it is that lack of the court approval in the investigation permits the National protection Agency is also in work to spy the communications that are used internationally (Risen & Lichtblau. 2005).  

            Bush support on the issue is that he also wanted rapid monitor communications that may remove the threats that are made to the U.S.  It has also been the system in helping disturb the plans of the terrorists and also prevent attacks in America. It is also a proof that also the monitoring group has never been suspected of any crime through monitoring of communication of the terrorists.   The agency is also the most secretive group that it does not expose itself on the public view although it sometimes works under tight restrictions as they spy the Americans or distributing information about them.  The surveillance is intended to abuse the numbers and the addresses of the terrorists in the American society.  The system has also been performing their meritless spying on the Americans who are connected to the supposed radicals over and done with the series telephone and electronic message statements which has been more effective to the American society (Risen & Lichtblau. 2005). 

Reference

James Risen, Eric Lichtblau. 2005, Bush Lets U.S Spy on Callers without Courts. 

Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?pagewanted=all