Sustainability

            Sustainability is an important approach that has achieved a great support.  It remains difficult to use it sue to its complexity and due to the huge shifts in thinking that, it intends.  What are much challenging in the concept of sustainability are the development and the use of technology that has significant negative outcomes for the health of people and the whole world.  Thus, sustainability requires the balanced search of environmental health, social equality and economic interests. 

            The use of fake trees would not form an environmental sustainability as climate change will seem as that derived from a skill narrative publication.  Researchers have already cautioned that the way of building enough cuts to the green house emission gas or gas from the fake trees is narrowing rapidly and the globe is likely to warm at a higher level this century unless a quick act is in use.   This forced some Australian researchers to entitle for a warning on cutting down the original trees burned.  This remains their main plan in that they must move faster to introduce the renewable energy rather than using the new technologies for innovations.  The use of the fake trees will not be helpful, as the researches had proofed a way for adjusted climate explored.  Nations should be able to understand the harm of these fake trees and avoid cutting down the other real trees as a way of strengthening communications beside a prospect of high climates and harsh climate conditions.  The use of these fake trees will affect the global climate and move down the universal temperature and use more time for emission slash (Schellnhuber, 2014).    

            With some initiative, a change of our notion towards the preservation of the environment will take place soon.  We will later recognize the symbolic and the social meanings of the real trees and the environment and not just the way of utilizing the economy. This will make us look at the future generations that will use them.  It appears not logic with our future generation using fake trees, as it will create a challenging life.  At the same time, we must know that there are things that we may not do business with, expect because on allowing someone else to have his share on environment.  As environment become more different, smaller areas will be given a huge significance and it might be possible for more people to share.  It is likely that the new technology will not apply in the making of the plastic trees or the artificial environments (Schellnhuber, 2014).

             It will be possible to form environments that seem reminiscent of other environments in other times and locations.  It is possible that through the working remembrance on the rewriting of history, environments will be having a new meaning. As a result, to this kind of sustainability, we will not be able to form alternative environments by substitution ways and reproduction. In order to form environmental substitutes, we must provide new things with significance by advertising and social forms.  Erudition about the divergence will become vital for appreciating the substitute environments.  We may replicate the environments through photographs, recordings and even brain manipulation.  What can be experienced in the natural environments may be more convenient than we can imagine. Fake trees are formed but there is no main reason to believe that these artificial environments need to be unacceptable to those that may experience their use (Schellnhuber, 2014).

            The uncommon environments are virtual and can be created and depend on our skills and they are policy based but not tradition.  It seems that the economic challenges will not be enough in conserving the environment or suggest how new environments can be formed either through planting natural trees.  What matters here is the financial and the social investments, in efforts of making important experiences and environments that will be an alternative policy. There is little that can be done by the plastic trees, but more can be done like just giving people the experience of nature.  The way that we experience nature grounded by our society that responds to the innovations.  The founder of utilitarianism was more concerned about the matters of the dead trees and the living and claimed that if there were natural trees, they would protect the environment from the global warming effects (Williams, 2001). 

            The fake trees do not have the natural mechanisms for cleaning and changing itself that the real trees has.  There, the hygiene question arises mainly where humans are involved.  Many of the fake trees have antimicrobial components.  The antimicrobial effects are based on the release of the silver icons.  Researchers protests that the rate of the release of the silver icons is low and the anti microbial chemical is firmly in the fake polymer.  Thus, the impact of the silver icons in the end of the product cycle shows the effects of the silver biocides.  At the end of its life, real trees decompose and returns to the natural cycles, fake trees depend on the landfill.  This does not give the approach to sustainability and causes huge harsh emissions (Williams, 2001). 

            According to Nozick on the justice and social contract, his theory is based on the notion that the society is an approach of cooperation for a common advantage between people.  This shows the conflicts between the personal interests and the proof of the shared interests.  If the society is, an issue of corporation between equals from a common advantage the status of the cooperation be protected in any equality in social status and must be acceptable. Through this, Rawls claims, “the principles that free and the rational people concerned to increase their personal interests would accept an initial position of equality as defining the important terms of their association (Pincione,2000). “     

            One of the options that have found some favor on the fake trees is that the sprinkle of sulphur gas across the sky on the artificial volcanoes.  Sulphur gas reacts with the water drips and becomes sulphuric tart, which reproduces the sun emission into the air.  This approach imitates the outcome of the actual volcanoes such as big outbreaks that produce vast quantity of sulphur in the air.  This causes a breezy outcome shown in the universal warmth records. Actual trees offer more help.  While not referred as sustainability, tree fixing and its preservation is a way of inhaling carbon from the atmosphere into the eyes.  Planting fake trees will be disastrous because if they do not work, then the nation will have a worse problem (Williams, 2001). 

Conclusion

            The only way to sustain a better environment is by eradicating the greenhouse emissions, by replacing the renewable energy through planting of real trees.  The longer the world plans to use the fake trees, the higher the cost of acclimatizing to the climatic changes and the high the dangers.  The sustainability hopes of the nature are that the fake trees are more likely to raise the global temperatures and by this, we have to see the kind of emissions from them in the near future.  If people think that they will adapt with the life of the fake tree emission, they must think about the future generation.  Will they be able to live in such environments?

 

 

 

 

Reference

Pincione, G. (2000). Rights, equality and liberty: Universidad Torcuato Di Tella law and philosophy lectures 1995-1997. Dordrecht [u.a.: Kluwer.

Schellnhuber, H. J., & Dahlem Workshop on Earth System Analysis for Sustainability. (2004). Earth system analysis for sustainability: Report of the 91st Dahlem Workshop on Earth System Analysis for Sustainability Berlin, May 25-30, 2003. Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.: MIT Press.

Williams, G. C. (2001). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.