Learning and Memory
Kalm, K., & Norris, D. (2016). Recall is not necessary for verbal sequence learning. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 104-113. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0544-0
The query of whether obvious recall or remembering information fast-tracks learning is significant in a broad range of real and actual world learning settings. Previous researches conducted have proposed that verbal sequence learning should be recalled or it subsidises a lot to it. Due to that reason, this paper consequently shows that recalls by previous researchers does not in any way predict learning and there is not a reason as to why it should be recalled. We therefore submit that previous research may have underrated the learning of the participants’, through the use of inferior performance measures, or through the use of manual or otherwise written memory. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that the quantity of spoken remembrance predicted how much intrusion from other types of to be remembered sequences would otherwise be perceived. As a matter of fact spoken recall arbitrated a lot of the error which was observed in the task (Kalm & Norris, 2016). Our information therefore supports the perception that learning through the overlapping of auditory-verbal is majorly propelled through learning linguistic representation but not on the enunciation motor responses. On the other hand, spoken recall appears to support already erudite representations, either if they are wrong or right, hence contributing to a participant recognising certain incentive as either learned or new, during the phase of presentation.
In a bid to provide the reasons as to why spoken recall may be necessary for concurrent learning of overlying auditory verbal sequence, and if the amount of spoken work predicts the amount of learning and the errors of a specific sequence, the author used qualitative analysis. The author sampled participants, where 22 right handed both male and female between the ages of 20-33 years volunteered. The participants were required to remember an order of eight acoustically presented monosyllabic letters in right order (Kalm & Norris, 2016). The syllabic sequence differed from the actual syllabic representation of the letters of the alphabet. All the participants were required to remember all the letters in the form which they were earlier on presented. The letters were read over and over again for twelve times. After the experiment, it was discovered that spoken recall affects the memory, and this was attributed to the repetition of the letters, which significantly showed that after the 9th repetition, the memory of the participants increased, and their levels of accuracy also improved, thus they were able to easily remember the letters in their correct form. The article has therefore not only proved that spoken recall improves the rate of remembering, part it also increases the accuracy, thus making it easier for people to be capable of clearly remembering. However, it was observed that about 10% of the memory was affected when the reading was interfered. Interference of the reading made it slightly hard for the participants to clearly remember the letters in the correct form, however they remembered what they had previous heard. Other than that, the method was accurate, as it proved how easily the memory changed when the reading was interfered with. In addition, it also made it clear how the memory improves with the accuracy of the reading.
According to my point of view, I strongly believe the study was very effective, due to the results that it has provided. The research looked deeper into the aspect of memory and learning, where it was evident that spoken recall indeed affects the memory, since repeated verbal information increases the ability to understand and to internalize the information, hence being able to remember. The information gathered from the research is very significant, as it will help in future developments of psychology. In addition, it will people to change their behaviour, thus easily understanding how to easily remember. Moreover, the study will also influence future research on psychology, hence understanding how the brain works, and how easily the memory can store information. Behaviour affects the memory, thus behaviours are deemed to change, since most people will change their own behaviour as a means of improving their memory. Finally, the research consequently explains how we can be able to improve our memory, and the factors which can hinder us from having a good memory. Due to that reason. We can be able to use different listening and learning techniques, thus easily understanding whatever we are being taught.
iv
The research has allowed me to gain an inner understanding into psychology, a factor which positively impacts my career. As a psychologist, one is required to understand how the human mind functions, how one understands and memorizes information, hence being able to clearly conduct psychological analysis at ease. This research has therefore seen me understanding how the human mind operates, and the factors which may hinder understanding, which in turn leads to poor memory. Similarly, I have also learnt that some factors which we consider as the factors which affect our memory, are indeed not the actual factors.
Reference
Kalm, K., & Norris, D. (2016). Recall is not necessary for verbal sequence learning. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 104-113. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0544-0
