Writing a Persuasive Email
To: all employees
From:
Subject: Evaluation Weightings
Dear employees,
Based on the workforce evaluation in the organization it is with concern that I inform you on the weights of the evaluations. Peer, self, client and managers’ evaluations hold distinct weights because they are based on different aspects. Peer evaluation is based on the relationship between employees which is mostly influenced by the ability to interact based on effective communication and understanding. Peer evaluation is, therefore, crucial because it helps in the analysis the ability of an individual to be a successful contributor in teamwork. In addition the ability to build lasting relationships with those that surrounds you are outlined.
Self-evaluation, on the other hand, is based on individual potential in accomplishing tasks and overcoming challenges. This can, therefore, be evaluated on the easiness that one feels when conducting duties and how suitable the job is for them. Self-evaluation is, therefore, crucial because it helps in demonstrating commitment, understanding of tasks and confidence.
Client evaluation is very crucial to the organization because it helps in highlighting the ability of individuals to relate with customers. This is therefore analyzed by the ability of an individual to solve issues raised by customers and also delivering satisfactory services to them consistently. Since the clients are the most crucial elements in influencing success it is, therefore, good for their needs to be fully taken take off at all times.
Managers’ evaluation holds greater weight because it is based on job performance, job experience, innovativeness, flexibility and consistency. An individual has to perform the duties well as stated in order to be ranked as well performing person. Creation of ideas is also crucial in that it helps the managers in evaluating the abilities of an individual. High performance, therefore, has to be consistent and also one should demonstrate flexibility in order to allow the corporation in achieving diversity. Therefore, each evaluation holds distinct weightings as they are based on different contribution aspects.
Work cited
William H. Baker & Matthew J. Baker. Laser technologies Inc. company overview. Pdf
