Summary
Everything that is termed as good or evil is both values. Value can be described as the general regard in which something is described to be desiring of worth. This can additionally be described as the individual's behaviors as well as principles of the judgment of what is crucial in real life. Objective reality is described as a class of things that individuals are certain about their existence independently of everyone’s opinions. Every individual is fully capable of verifying the objective reality features. This, therefore, implies that every aspect that cannot be fully justified cannot be a section of the objective reality. Based on a claim from a moral skeptic the world is characterized by moral features and this can thus be established through careful examination of the surrounding.
Every occurrence or even in life holds a scientific examination which therefore shows that all the propositions are filled with doubts and cannot, therefore, be considered to be true. Moral facts cannot be utilized in explaining other moral or immoral facts because in getting guidelines of what individuals ought to do normative facts achieve this well.
Justified moral beliefs cannot be achieved according to a skeptic. This is because in order to gain moral knowledge one is required to hold some beliefs about the concept which are real as well as justified. This cannot, therefore, be true because most of the b beliefs are never good enough. The beliefs may have been derived from sources that hold no reliability, guesses as well as evidence that is wrongly constructed. Achieving moral knowledge is, therefore, a thing that cannot be attained.
Knowledge basically necessitates certainty and based on ethics certainty is unattainable which makes is an impossible concept. Moral knowledge cannot be achieved also because of the presence of inadequate evidence. Adequate knowledge is crucial in justification of moral beliefs in order to make the knowledge objective.
According to the regress argument all the moral beliefs can be challenged. The argument starts with its apparent reality which is that for each moral beliefs credentials can always be required. However, this argument also requires justification of its belief. This, therefore, implies that everything in life requires real answers and questions must always arise. Therefore the presence of a moral belief is essential in developing moral knowledge as justification is the major condition of attaining knowledge. In summary, any policy of rule requires an explanation which justifies the rationale behind every belief being questioned.
An individual’s rationality is based on the objective of satisfying their individualized interests as well as desires. Everyone has a reason for being moral .a moral is the manifestation of high guidelines for appropriate behavior. Individuals will normally engage in something moral only if this action will yield benefits or satisfy their requirements. This is a matter that is subjective in nature as moral conduct fully depends on personal options. This is not, therefore, compactible with moral objectivism. Being moral generally, means being virtuous which clarifies that there is always a reason for being ethical.
In my opinion, I believe that moral facts are mutual to a different type of normative facts which is the epistemic facts. These facts are essential in addressing what ought’s to be done and believed provided that those beliefs are objected at the genuine truth. Moral knowledge cannot be achieved because of every moral belief held by a single individual there must be another individual who objects it. Due to the existence of a rational individual justification for beliefs cannot be achieved thus making knowledge impossible. Everything that is in existence is, in turn, questionable.
Reference
Chapter 6: Values In A Scientific World, Chapter 7: Moral Knowledge I: Four Skeptical Arguments, Chapter 8: Moral Knowledge Ii: The Regress Argument, & Chapter 9: Why Be Moral?
