Edudorm Facebook

Topics and Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper Instructions:

Module B Response Paper

In Module A, you saw how a historian uses a primary source (Columbus's journal) to create an historical narrative. Now, let's back up a bit and take a close look at primary sources. In this process, we will construct the context of the source.

First, some definitions:
In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called an original source or evidence) is an artifact, document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic (Wikipedia).

Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources. So far, you have been interpreting the source, rather than reading a secondary source by someone who has already done the interpretation for you.

The other important definition here is context: the circumstances that form the historical setting for an event, statement, idea, or source and the terms in which it can be fully understood and assessed (Google). Students most often do not develop the context of the source in their papers. For example, many of you have received feedback from me indicating that you need an introduction that lays out the context of the source you're commenting on.

For this Module, you will choose a source from the list below and:

1) simply report on the primary source by using the source to answer the questions below. In your Response Paper, you can just list the questions as they are here and answer them in full sentences. For some of the sources, the answers will be, in part, in Foner's introduction to the source.

a. What type of source is it [an interview, a diary entry, a painting, music, a public record (court document, census document, political document, treaty, etc.)]?

b. When was the source published or produced?

c. Motive:
--Who created the source and why?
--Who is the author and what is her or his place in society (explain why you are justified in thinking so)?
--Why do you think she or he wrote it? What evidence in the text tells you this?
--Does the author have a thesis or main point? What -- in one sentence -- is that thesis?

2) Next, you will include a paragraph that discusses the context of the source. As I've noted above, context is the circumstances that form the historical setting for an event, statement, idea, or source and the terms in which it can be fully understood and assessed. This can be found in the source itself, in the introduction to the source, and in Give Me Liberty!.

For example, if you were using "Olaudah Equiano on Slavery (1789)", you would use Chapter 4 in Give Me Liberty! to discuss the Triangle Trade because that's the context (the historical setting, backdrop, circumstances, etc.) in which Equiano's narrative was written).

As with other Response Papers, this should be between 250-350 words.



The Pueblo Revolt (1680)

or

Adam Smith, The Results of Colonization (1776)

or

Nathaniel Bacon on Bacon’s Rebellion (1676)

or

Memorial against Non-English Immigration (1727)

or

Olaudah Equiano on Slavery (1789)

or

Advertisements for Runaway Slaves and Servants (1738)

or

The Trial of John Peter Zenger (1735)

or

The Great Awakening Comes to Connecticut (1740)

Remember to quote the source.

573 Words  2 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

what are the similarities and differences between the spread of Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam along the major trade routes?

30 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

1-2. Since the beginning of recorded history, there has been differences in opinion regarding the rights of conquest through exploration and colonization.  When Christopher Columbus landed on the islands off North America in 1492, it marked the beginning of centuries of argument over the rights of Europeans versus those whose communities pre-dated European contact with the Americas (sometimes called “natives” “Native Americans” “American Indians” or “Indians”).  Write an essay that gives two examples from the primary sources in Voices of Freedom chapter 1 that examines different views discussing the rights of European explorers and colonists versus those whose communities pre-dated European contact with the Americas.  Your “how-conclusion” should compare or contrast the authors, audiences, and the purposes of your two chosen documents.
2-2. As Eric Foner writes, “Seventeenth-century (1600s) North America was an unstable and dangerous environment.  Diseases decimated Indian and settler populations alike.  Colonies were racked by religious, political, and economic tensions and drawn into imperial wars and conflict with Indians.”  Write an essay that gives two examples from the primary sources in Voices of Freedom chapter 2 that explains why people would chose to emigrate, often risking their lives, to the colonies in English America.  Your “how-conclusion” should compare or contrast the authors, audiences, and the purposes of your two chosen documents.

3-2.  As Eric Foner writes, “In the last quarter of the seventeenth century, a series of crises rocked the European colonies of North America.  Social and political tensions boiled over in sometimes ruthless conflicts between rich and poor, free and slave, settler and Indian, and members of difference religious groups.”  Write an essay discussing two examples from the primary sources in Voices of Freedom chapter 3 that explains different reasons for the “tensions” in North America (AKA: what are the grievances of the two authors and why?).  Your “how-conclusion” should compare or contrast the authors, audiences, and the purposes of your two chosen documents.

4-2. Throughout the first part of the eighteenth century (1700s), the western world witnessed the development of the period usually called the Enlightenment.  Central to much of the debate during that period among intellectuals on both sides of the Atlantic were theories regarding ‘the natural rights of man’—in Lockean terms “life, liberty and property” (see chapter 4 of Give Me Liberty).  Write an essay discussing two examples from the primary sources in Voices of Freedom chapter 4 that explores conflict between Enlightenment ideology and the realities of government and/or social action.  Your “how-conclusion” should compare or contrast the authors, audiences, and the purposes of your two chosen documents

439 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

Explain why many historians consider the Thomas Jefferson’s election to the presidency to be the -Revolution of 1800. How was he elected?

33 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

You will write a 3-page paper (not including the title page and bibliography) on the causes and origins of the Second Punic War as discussed by the ancient historians Polybius and Livy. The paper must only reference the works by these historians that are included in this module/week's Reading & Study folder. The paper must be typed, double-spaced, and in current Turabian format (with title page and bibliography).  links to polybius and livy
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/3*.html
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah../Livy/Livy21.html

94 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

US history - How WWI affected the lives of Americans

21 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a war crime?

21 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

Effect 2003 Iraq war had on America's economic growth

20 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

Explain what "morality, knowledge, and religion" meant to those in the founding era, and why it was believed our nation would only succeed if based on these principles. The terms "knowledge, morality and religion" had very specific meanings to those in the founding era. Be sure to extrapolate that meaning from your assigned textbook readings. The information can be found in chapter 5 of your textbook. Discuss whether or not those same beliefs can still be the basis for success in the now religiously diverse America. Be sure to fully explain your position

104 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

After the Reformation, the Holy Roman Empire included both Protestant and Catholic territories. Between 1618 and 1648 there was continuous war within the Empire. To what extent was the Thirty Years' War a religious conflict?

46 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

Many consider Franklin’s Autobiography an early depiction of a “representative”
American; that is, a model for other Americans to follow. What appear to be the most important characteristics of that American? Define and illustrate them from the Autobiography. Your conclusion may reflect on the implications of this model for Americans. Are there pitfalls to having a single model?

69 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

  1. Give an argument for how the Black Death and Military Revolution changed European society and paved the way for modernity, giving concrete examples

    2.    Devise and support an argument for (or against) studying the “global Middle Ages.”

49 Words  1 Pages

Topic and Questions We Can Help You To Answer
Paper Instructions:

We have been looking at a number of monuments erected by rulers to commemorate their rule or their accomplishments. Sometimes these monuments have been pulled down or defaced by subsequent regimes. In the first assignment, you were asked to consider whether or not it made sense to preserve cultural heritage at the cost of human life, and to think about whether there might be some gray areas in terms of keeping a cultural landmark as a sign of respect and an acknowledgement of mutual humanity between the people who lived there and the invading or liberating army. To deface something or someone is to suggest that they are not important, and cannot participate in humanity. For this assignment, I would like you to consider the current debate over Confederate War Monuments, and think about whether or not they should be removed and how that removal should take place. Does removing these monuments have anything in common with some of the art that you have looked at thus far, particularly in West Asia/Near East where there were successive regimes?
Read the following articles and post a response essay to the topics.
https://hyperallergic.com/395627/robert-e-lee-confederate-monument-charlottesville/
https://hyperallergic.com/399061/confederate-monument-removal-op-ed/
The four essays on four very different types of war memorials: https://smarthistory.org/tag/a-level-war-memorials/

Your initial discussion board post should include the following:

1. A position statement: do you think that the Confederate monuments should be taken down? Why or why not? Please give several concrete reasons for either position.

2. A short discussion of of the three articles. Which one did you find most convincing? Why?

3. Evidence of further research. Do a google search or search in an online art magazine such as Hyperallergic or Artsy. What else were you able to find out from your search? Make sure you include the author, title of article, and source that you consulted outside of the assigned readings.

322 Words  1 Pages
Get in Touch

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to inform us and we will gladly take care of it.

Email us at support@edudorm.com Discounts

LOGIN
Busy loading action
  Working. Please Wait...