Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
Visit the following website on Saint-Sernin cathedral in Toulouse, France, ca. 1070-1120:
Saint-Sernin Website: https://europeupclose.com/article/toulouses-saint-sernin-largest-romanesque-church-in-europe/ Then read about pilgrimages: Pilgrimage Routes: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/medieval-world/romanesque-art/beginners-guide-romanesque/a/pilgrimage-routes-and-the-cult-of-the-relic Based on the information above and from the lectures and textbook, answer the following questions:
1) How was Saint-Sernin the ideal Romanesque pilgrimage church? List at least 4 ways that St. Sernin exemplified this type of church that accomodated pilgrims. Post your answer to the Discussion Board - Question 6 Discussion Essays and Responses.
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
CRITICAL REVIEW ESSAY GUIDELINES (Book review) Write an essay of 5-6 pages 1500-1800 words, double spaced, that identifies the primary arguments and logics of the assigned book and then MAKES A CLEAR AND WELL SUPPORTED logical argument about that book. You are writing a critical review essay: do NOT summarize and agree. Your first paper is on: Author: Gordon Martel Book: Origins of the Second World War Reconsidered Submit electronically as an MS WORD document via the Blackboard Assignments tab. Do NOT convert to pdf or any other format. Logistical 1. Your papers should be 5-6 full pages long. If you have more to say, fine -- I′ll be happy to read as much as you give me. Less than 5 is getting to a problem and less than 4 will result in significant deductions. 2. Proofread! Since I′m going to read a lot of papers, I don′t want to waste my time wading through work that you′ve just thrown together. Therefore, you must give yourself time to proofread your work. I′ll tolerate one typographic error per page -- but when I hit the sixth typo, I′ll start taking off one point per mistake. PROOFREAD! 3. The papers must be typed, double spaced, 12-point, normal font, with margins no larger than the standard Word default margins (left, right, top, and bottom margins no larger than one inch). Please use page numbers and a cover/title page. 4. If you′re unsure that your grammar is correct, take your paper to the writing center and ask for help. The folks at the writing center do a very good job, and you′ll be doing yourself a favor by acquiring a necessary and important set of writing skills. If I find that your grammar and style could use some work, I′ll ask you to go to the writing center. You can always ask me! Substantive 1. No more than two pages of your paper should be summary of the author′s arguments. Most, or preferably all, or your paper should be critical analysis. Even a flawed or simplistic analysis, where you think about the material yourself and draw your own conclusions and insights from it, will earn a better grade than the most well-written, sophisticated paper that′s just a rehash of the book. 2. Analysis simply means drawing out arguments and themes that the author makes, either implicitly or explicitly, and expressing what you think is most interesting, useful, ridiculous, appalling, etc., about them. Keep in mind that authors don′t always make even their main arguments explicit -- you may have to do some thinking to figure out what the book is really trying to say. You don′t necessarily have to encompass the entire book; if there are one or two sub-themes that strike you as most important, then focus on those. 4. It might help to ask the following questions while you read (obviously you can′t answer all these questions in every five-page paper; these are just suggestions for ways to think about the book as you read it): * What is the major argument(s) the author is making? What kind of cause --˃ effect relationships does the author assert or hypothesize, either explicitly or implicitly? For each chapter, and then for the entire book, try to summarize the argument in two or three sentences. * What are the assumptions, either theoretical or policy-oriented, the author is making to advance his main points? If the assumptions were changed, how would the book′s main arguments be different? Sometimes (actually, most of the time), the author doesn′t explicitly state what those assumptions are -- but the good ones do. * What kind of evidence does the author use to support the book′s arguments (interviews, personal experience, newspaper and journal articles, speeches, etc.)? Are the arguments convincingly backed up with evidence, or are you expected just to take the author′s word for it? * Are there subthemes -- ideas that, although they′re not the main subject of the text, still pervade the book -- that the author doesn′t draw out explicitly? * If the arguments are theoretical ones, how do they relate to actual incidents and cases you know about? Conversely, if the arguments are practical ones, how do they relate to the theoretical perspectives we′ve studied? 5. Make sure you have a subject and verb in every sentence. 6. A long sentence is not necessarily a better sentence -- each sentence should express only one thought. Don′t be afraid to break up a long sentence into two or three shorter ones. It will usually flow better that way. 7. Make an argument in the paper, preferably one that answers a question starting with the word ″why.″ Do not simply recite facts and figures; I can look those up myself. I′m interested in your opinions and in what you think is the most interesting way to frame a topic or an issue. 8. Make sure that the reader of your paper knows (1) what your analysis/argument is, and (2) how you′re going to go about supporting that analysis/argument, all within the first couple of paragraphs of the paper. In other words -- STATE YOUR MAIN POINT/CONCLUSIONS, WITH A SUMMARY OF YOUR SUPPORTING EVIDENCE, UP FRONT…FIRST PARAGRAPH! The first page of your paper should provide your reader with a ″road map.″ Try something like, “In this paper, I argue that…” or “This paper argues…” You are not writing a mystery novel -- the reader will understand what you′re trying to convey more easily if he has some idea what′s coming as he reads through the body of the paper. Don′t be afraid to repeat yourself as a consequence. 9. As you make the points that support your argument, you′ll probably be aware of the places in which your argument is controversial or in which a reasonable person might disagree with you. Preempt those controversies in your text. Point out what those opposing arguments might be, and why you think your point of view is more accurate or reasonable…only if you have the time and space. 10. Don′t use a bigger word when a smaller one will do. One of my pet peeves is the word ″utilize″ -- why not just say ″use″? Of course, if a five-syllable word is the only way to convey your meaning, then by all means use (not utilize!) it, but remember, I′m interested in the content and sophistication of your ideas and analysis, not your skill in using a thesaurus. 11. Don′t use a lot of direct quotes from the book. Your own analysis comes through if you paraphrase the work instead of quoting it directly. If you do quote, you must cite (I′m not picky about formats). And, if you rely on other material you′ve read in formulating your own analysis, you must cite that material in as well. It may be tempting, particularly in a course of this nature, simply to repeat back someone else′s analysis of the subject at hand and call it your own. Please keep in mind that (a) I′m no idiot; I can tell the difference between your work and work that′s been through a professional editing and publishing process; and (b) I read a lot; it′s quite possible that I′ll recognize the material you′re using. I will not be tolerant of plagiarism. The first time it happens, I′ll take it directly through the university honor code process. The very simple way to avoid problems is to footnote another folks′ work that you rely on. 12. While I don’t want you to “agree” with WHATEVER AUTHOR, I do want a critical assessment that you glean from the reading. If you tend to agree with significant points of the argument, that is a-okay…but focus on depth, extent, breadth of Weiss’s argument. Does he go far enough? Too far? What about methodology? Is the sample size good—too big, too small, etc.? Don’t simply agree. 13. Finally, make sure you are writing about THE ASSIGNED book, THEIR argument. Your own argument should be a critical assessment of the author/book. Keep that in mind. extra notes: You need to describe the arguments you intend to make in the thesis. DO this up front, early in the paper. Don′t have a thesis that basically says, ″this paper will argue that there ARE weaknesses.″ PERIOD. DO argue that the most compelling weaknesses of the book are, 1, 2, and 3. EXPLAIN THEM.
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
The legend of King Arthur is well-known in literature. Based on Unsolved Mysteries of History, there is little to suggest it is true. Do you think it is important for people to believe in legends like King Arthur even if there is little evidence to support them? Why or why not? Write a short (3 paragraphs) explanatory essay stating your opinion. Justify your opinion and conclusions with relevant textual evidence (quotes or paraphrased ideas from sources) and background knowledge. Remember to use relevant vocabulary from the text in your essay.
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
Beginning in the 18th century, the Industrial Revolution made fundamental changes in agriculture, manufacturing, transportation, and housing. Architecture changed in response to the new industrial landscape as well. Prior to the late 19th century, the weight of a multistory building had to be supported principally by the strength of its walls. Thus, the taller the building, the more strain this placed on the lower sections. Since there were clear engineering limits to the weight such loadbearing walls could sustain, large designs meant massively thick walls on the ground floors, and definite limits on the building's height.
Which do you feel best encapsulates the Industrial Revolution? Consider the influence of the advancements of the era and how they helped industry to progress. Provide a two-paragraph description of your selection, provide the name and background of the architect (or firm), and describe how your example best represents this shift in materials and building technology.
Please write about the reading room of the Bibliothèque Nationale (1860–1867) (Designed by Henri Labrouste)
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
Use this hyperlink to access the document: "https://ndc.learninghouse.com/pluginfile.php/541756/mod_page/content/2/Discourse_Dissent.pdf"
Pages 50-65 (The Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan in 1979: Failure of Intelligence or of the Policy Process?)
Students will be expected to produce a 2 pages report that details the below points
Summary Provide a short summary of the Case (including a short Background) Identify the events that lead up to the success or failure of the event If the events concluded as an Intelligence failure, identify if there was one of the following: -Intelligence Collection Failure -Analytical Failure -Policy Failure Analytical Review -Identify and discuss the tools that were assessable -Did the analyst or Intelligence Community have access to the tools or date needed Lessons learned -Provide a recommendation or conclusion, identifying the lessons learned and how Intelligence can be used to prevent the events from happening again.
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
Explain what you think cultural context means. Cite an example of a piece of art (from today, or anytime or place) but connect the image to the cultural context. Briefly explain what cultural context means. Support your ideas with a scholarly source(s). Your source can be a website, or a textbook, or a video, but your explanation must connect cultural context & Art History. Be specific about cultural context and Art History. Follow MLA citation guidelines for all written work all the time no matter how short or long your response is.
2. Then, cite at least one example of art or architecture from Module 2, and focus your comment on how the piece you pick represents the cultural context of the Minoan world. Use the worksheet to help guide your process, but you do not need to respond to every point because you will not be able to. If you can't address an idea (like the name of the artist, or patron, or where it was originally located, or how it was made) then don't mention it!
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
How do these two accounts of the Battle of Hoogly differ? Is there any way to reconcile the two into a single narrative?
Background: In 1632, the Mughal ruler, Shah Jahan, ordered an attack on the city of Hoogly, a fortified Portuguese trading post on the northeastern coast of India. For the Portuguese, who had profited from half a century of triangular trade between India, China, and various countries in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, the loss of Hoogly at the hands of the Mughals hastened the decline of their influence in the region. Presented here are two contemporary versions of the battle. The first, from the Padshahnama (Book of Kings), relates the course of events from the Mughal point of view. The second account is by John Cabral, a Jesuit missionary who was a resident of Hoogly at the time.
Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer: Paper Instructions:
You are to write an essays of at least 850 words. At the end of each essay you should write down the word count. You are welcome to go over the minimum word count.
You should use short quotations and references from the texts and readings to illustrate specific points or arguments you are making.
Keep in mind that the strongest essays will include material from multiple sessions. Use materials from at least two sessions (lectures) for each essay, preferably three or more if you can.
Each essay MUST be properly documented with parenthetical citations, which include the name of the author and the page number – there is no need for a works cited page, as the texts are all common. For the Textbook, (Hunt, page number) is sufficient. For the Sources book (Lualdi, page number). If you want to cite the lectures, simply reference the name of the lecture (first slide of each lecture).
Only in the case you use outside sources do you need to have a works cited page but I strongly discourage you from using general webpages like Wikipedia. If you do use online sources you need to offer a link to them in your works cited page. As this is an exam, any instance of plagiarism or use of outside sources that are not cited will be reported to an Academic Integrity Officer. Any exam that has no citations will receive 0 points
If you use materials, books, and other items that are not easily accessible to the instructor, please keep a copy of them as I might ask you to provide them to me to verify the accuracy of your citations. If you can not provide them to me within a week of it being requested, you will receive 0 points for the exam.
You need to have some sort of argument – why are you writing this essay? What points are you trying to make.
Please keep in mind that the strongest historical essays pay close attention to the chronology of events. An essay that moves back and forth in time period is generally a disorganized essay, so I would suggest you try your best to keep your events and examples in chronological order. How does the governmental and class structure of the Greek-city states (especially that of Athens) in the Classical Age compare to that the Roman Republic? What were the major problems, societal and otherwise, that they faced that led to the eventual collapse of democratic and Republican styles of government in both Greece and Rome?
For this question I want you to be clear as to what specific time periods you are discussing. The periods of monarchy for both Greece and Rome are irrelevant to this question, as is the period of the Roman Empire.
This website is owned and operated by PFS Limited.
Company Registration office is at:
2875 NE 194st St 404, Miami, FL 33180
Edudorm.com provides writing and research services for limited use only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references and in accordance with Terms & Conditions
