Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Food industry and public health –how food companies try to influence government nutrition policies. How do you think nutrition guidelines and school lunches should be designed and regulated?  What role do you think the food industry should play? What is their social responsibility? If you wanted to ensure that government nutrition guidelines and school lunches were developed based on objective nutrition science, how might you organize a stakeholder campaign to move in that direction? Using no more than 750 words, describe who the key stakeholders are, and which stakeholder(s) would be most effective. Describe what you would want your designated stakeholder(s) to do. What are some specific goals you could identify? How would you evaluate success? What are metrics you could use in your campaign?

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Research Critique studies - 6 randomised control trial studies which is needed to be critically appraised using CASP tool. No qualitative retrospective studies needed, because all 6 studies for our topic are randomised control trail studies.So we need to critically appraise that 6 randomised control trail studies using CASP tool.
For more clarity, please go through the 'Critical Appraisal of a Randomised Controlled Trial Exercise' which I have attached with the work and make sure that we include answering the 10 questions provided using CASP tool. When you criticise, in the hierarchy of evidence (a triangular diagram) which explains the level of randomised control trial in the diagram, must also be included with explanation.
Chapter 2: Identifying and appraising a clinical guideline: ANALYSE THE EVIDENCE
Identify, outline and critically analyse the evidence underpinning the guideline and comment on its quality.  It is also possible to appraise the Guideline Development Process – this may considered if the underpinning evidence is minimal or absent. It is acceptable to appraise the evidence and/or the guideline development.

The divided 4 parts should be done appropriately :

Screening Questions

The first two questions are screening questions and if the answer to either of these is no then the study may be of limited usefulness.

Q1. Did the study ask a clearly focused question?

Q2. Was this an RCT and was it appropriately so?

Methodology

Questions 3 to 7 are intended to assess the methodology of the study. The final published report of the study which includes the results has very little detail on the methodology so you will also have to read the published report of the study protocol to answer these questions. 

Q3. Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups?

(a)    How were participants allocated to the intervention and control groups? Was the process truly random?
(b)    Was stratification used?
(c)    How was the randomisation schedule generated and how were participants allocated to intervention and control groups?
(d) Are the groups well balanced? Are any differences reported between the groups at entry to the trial?
(e) Are there any differences that may confound the result?

Q4. Were participants, staff and study personnel “blind” to participants study group?

Consider: 
Blinding is not always possible
If every effort was made to achieve blinding
Does it matter in this study i.e. could there be observer bias?

Q5. Were all patients accounted for?

a)    Was there a CONSORT diagram and were all the participants accounted for?
b)    Were the reasons for withdrawal given?
c)    Did participants have the option to cross-over from their allocated treatment at randomisation to the other treatment? i.e. could placebo patients switch to dronedarone or vice versa?
d)    Were all participants followed up in each study group? i.e. was there loss to follow up?
e)    Were all the participant’s outcomes analysed by the groups to which they were originally allocated? i.e. was an intention to treat analysis used?

Q6. Were the participants in all groups followed up and the data collected in the same way?

Q7. Did the study have enough participants to minimise the play of chance? i.e. is there a power calculation?

Results 

The results of an RCT should be scrutinised in a similar way to the methods. Q8 and Q9 prompt us to ask questions about how meaningful the results presented actually are.

Q8. How are the results presented and what is the main result?

(a)    Are the results presented as a proportion of people experiencing an outcome, such as risks or as a measurement such as mean or median survival curves and hazards?
(b)    How large is the size of this result and how meaningful is it?
(c)    How would you sum up the results of the trial in one sentence?


Q9. How precise are these results?

(a)    Is a confidence interval reported?
(b)    Is a p-value reported?

Relevance

Once we have assessed the quality of the methodology and considered the importance of the results, we should think about how the results could be applied to our local population and whether a change in practice seems justified.

Q10. Were all important outcomes considered so the results can be applied?

(a)    Were the people included in the trial similar to your population?
(b)    What was the comparator and was it suitable?
(c)    Was the study and follow-up of an appropriate duration for the disease state and intervention under review?
(d)    Does the setting of the trial differ from your local setting?
(e)    Could the same treatment be provided in your local setting?
(f)    Do the benefits of this treatment outweigh the risks/costs?
(g)    Should policy or practice change as a result of the evidence contained within this trial?

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Please add 4 page (reference page not included) on human papilloma virus (HPV) and it potential economic burden on the US population if gone untreated. HPV has the potential to develop into cervical cancer. compare the cost of prevention to the economic burden of cervical cancer. Include: background of disease (HPV and cervical cancer), prevention methods,  prevalence in the united states, cost of HPV vaccine on population compared to cost of healthcare expenses for cervical cancer treatment, projected cervical cancer health care expenditures for years 2030,2040, 2050.

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

SCENARIO: You are working in human resources for an investment firm that is underwriting part of the 2018 FIFA (Soccer) World Cup to be held in several different cities in Russia. Several of the company’s employees returned from an organizing trip there showing symptoms of an unknown infectious disease. Your boss asks you to take the lead in addressing both internal and external concerns about their illness. In your initial report informing your boss about these issues, you should address the following points:
a.          Identify the various stakeholders that may have concerns about this illness and/or who will be involved in addressing it. Explain each group’s role in this potential crisis.
b.        Identify the information that you need in order to answer questions, including if different stakeholder groups might need different information.
c.          Determine where you might find that information and when it might be available.
d.        Draft a press release addressing relevant concerns.

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

BSN Nursing
Write a 3–4 page report for the committee that provides your findings:

Summarize the issues facing rural health care providers' efforts to deliver quality care.
Explain the use of information management tools and technologies to monitor and improve outcomes.
Recommend three new technologies that improve patient outcomes post-hospitalization, in rural settings.
Support your recommendations for new technologies with evidence-based research.

Your report should meet the following criteria:

Contain between 750–1000 words (3–4 pages).
Include a minimum of 3 references. (These must be recent, from within the past five years.)
Be double-spaced in Times New Roman font, 12 point.

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Effects of Music Therapy in Awaken Memories and Boosting Brain Activities on Patients Suffering From Alzheimer and Dementia

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Review the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Identfiy the massive innovation funded by the Affordable Care Act and discuss a model that relies on technology to promote optimal patient centered outcomes.

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Select one department within a hospital that uses a specialized health information system. Upon selection, develop a
research paper that encompasses the following activities:
1. Describe the departmental health record systems or health information system.
2. Explain how the departmental health information system contributes to the electronic health record (EHR).
3. Discuss the factors that cause facilities to use multiple information systems.
4. Describe the health information system workflow of the health department you have selected.

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Start paper with thesis sentence. Please write 10 pages on different programs in place that are used to fight hunger in America Please use the 5 websites included below as well as 5 other different kinds of sources to a total of 10 sources. Please do it in APA style with work cited

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

How can you relate the article on Team personality to healthcare? What are some of the management issues with allied health workers? How do they relate to team personality?

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Implementing evidence-based guidelines: inpatient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Questions We Can Help You To Answer

Paper instructions:

Cholera outbreak in Haiti