your opinion about the article between the world and me by Richard wright, needs to be three fully developed paragraphs do not generalize be specific about the summary. Centered the wording on race, class or gender. Thanks
Your task is to interpret the significance (or the meaning in relation to life, society, the world etc) of "The storm." Remember to use the "elements"(plot, character, setting, point of view, figurative language) of the story to support your thesis, and that the evidence for your claim must be consistent and pervasive, in that there should be no significant evidence that contradicts the reading.
Do a feminist reading (one which concentrates on how male oppression and control <patriarchy>affect the situation and /or perception of characters) of "The Storm." Such an interpretation must reveal a pattern of thinking and/or behavior arguably influenced (consciously or unconsciously) by male norms and negatively affecting the person or people in the question, just as it must "account for "all of the story without obvious inconsistencies or contradictions.
In "Social Observers," Grimshaw and Ravetz describe '60s direct cinema as a "new filmmaking approach that was hailed as a radical break with established forms of documenting social life...understood as a commitment to 'showing,' not telling-that is, in place of narrated films with their summary and expert opinion, audiences were now to be presented with materials generated from recording events, situations, and relationships as they unfolded... audiences were now expected to engage actively with what was presented, to evaluate the different kinds of evidence and interpret the significance of what they were being shown." In "The Reality-Based Community," Erika Balsom talks about contemporary returns to observational modes of documentary making in the context of the urgency of “the judicious study of discernible reality in an age of alternative facts." Use these two texts (and other readings from this week, if you'd like) as a framework for considering at least one film from Tuesday's class and one film from Thursday's class. How do you understand the changing significance and stakes of realism and observation in documentary filmmaking from the '60s to now?
Pinokio+ compare with 2 other tails Content The proposal should have 4 sections 1. Introduction – Length: One detailed paragraph • Provide a brief explanation of your topic and your initial thoughts and hypotheses regarding the topic, i.e., what you intend to argue about it. Keep in mind that your ultimate argument and/or hypotheses might change as you do research and begin writing. • Formulate a thesis statement that includes the main points to be discussed in the seminar paper (4-5 points) 2. Literature Review – Length: 4-5 detailed paragraphs • Present and discuss the research that has already been done on your topic and how it relates to your argument. • Choose at least 4 academic articles. These articles must be approved by me (you can email the titles to me). • Think critically and do not be afraid to question and disagree with existing research. What original contribution will your research make to the conversation? 3. Structure – Length: One detailed paragraph • How do you plan to structure your seminar paper? Division of chapters, points within chapters. • What are your plans for additional research?
4. Annotated Bibliography • Find 7 academic sources (including those used for the literature review) and write a bibliography in accordance with the APA style. • For the 3 additional sources (those not used in the literature review) write a short annotation that includes: a brief summary of the main ideas, your analysis of these ideas and how you plan to use them in your seminar paper.
Formatting 3-4 typed pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman font size 12, 2.54 margins, cover page with your name, ID number, course name, instructor name, title of the seminar paper (be creative), date of submission.
For your first entry, please type 400 words (double spaced in a 12 pt Times New Roman font) in response to the below prompt:
What area of writing are you most confident in? Why? Explain your answer. It is ok if you lack confidence overall, but you need to qualify your answer. Regarding writing, what area do you need the most work in? It is ok if you wish to discuss several explicit areas. What’s your plan to make the class enjoyable and useful to you? In other words, what can you do to make yourself succeed in our class? Be specific. Discuss your reaction to our class theme. Do you think it will be engaging? Interesting? How do you think the depths of the ocean will compare to the vastness of the stellar and interstellar? What do you think our texts will be like? This is a fairly open ended question. Give a detailed response here—don’t use fluff or be vacuous. Take a look at our syllabus and look up summaries of our texts. Which seems like it may be the most enjoyable or interesting to you? Why? Give a detailed response here—don’t use fluff or be vacuous. I am very much looking forward to reading your entries here and promise to respond to them.
**you may be informal here in your language choice; you may use I; you may give your opinion(s). However, you must cite as per MLA 8th edition when and if you use any sources. You should also use MLA 8 to format your heading and title. Basically, these are informal response papers in formal MLA format.
**Grammar, structure /organization, spelling, and the like count.
**Please submit your work as a .doc, .docx, or .rtf.
"Streaming Live and Harlem Renaissance" Please respond to one (1) of the following, using sources under the Explore heading as the basis of your response:
Write for one (1) minute using the stream of consciousness writing method (Note: You may also type it offline and copy it within this discussion thread). Describe your experience and your reaction to what you wrote. Of the samples of the stream of consciousness technique given in this week's chapters, determine which you prefer and explain the reasons why.
Of the various authors, artists, and musicians who participated in the Harlem Renaissance, identify the person whose autograph you would most want, and explain the reasons why. Provide one (1) example that illustrates the reason why you selected the person that you did. Explore:
Putting it all together It is now time to compile your resources and reflect upon what you've learned about identity.
You can include media, graphs, images, etc., as long as your word count does not fall below 2000 words. You must turn in this paper in a Word Document and be very precise about formatting. You must engage ideas from at least 5-6 outside sources.
Sections of the Research Essay
Introduction and Literature Review This section should provide an overview of the identity politics you chose to focus on in your research. For example, if you focus on race, you may want to describe some current issues in the US (Ferguson, Detroit, mass-incarceration) or use narrative to open your paper. Or a combination of both.
Then you must explain what your sources say about the issue. This is the place to flex your synthesis muscles! What conversations are happening? What do other researchers say about it? How do different people approach the problem? What do they have in common, and where do they diverge?
For more on how to write a Literature Review visit https://owl.excelsior.edu/research/literature-reviews/
Methods Your methods section will explain how you came to this particular research interest, how you went about conducting research, who you interviewed and why, and how you put all the information together. This section can contain direct language from your research proposal, and it needs to do a good job establishing your rhetorical position. This section goes a long way in establishing trust with your readers as you will explain your personal relationship with the topic while demonstrating your fair-minded approach.
For more on how to do this section and the general structure of APA organization, go to this part of the Excelsior OWL
Results The Results section explains what you found out from your research. This should be the longest part of your essay, so draw out each point carefully. Think about connections between your reference texts and your interview. Think about how your interview illustrates broader cultural phenomenon in your reference texts.
Discussion This section concludes your research essay. Remember that a conclusion should never shut down the conversation by procuring a "right" answer or "winning" side. Nor should it regurgitate what you wrote about in previous sections. Rather, this section describes the implications of your research findings, as well as provide suggestions for future research. In other words, offer insight as to what your research could be used for, and explain how researchers writing after you might provide insight using a slightly different lens. And finally, use this section to reflect on your results. What do you think merits further study? What was surprising about your research findings? What, if anything, wasn't? Weave these kinds of questions into the entire Discussion section as you talk about implications and suggest future lines of inquiry.
Discuss your reaction to the character of Hamlet in the two (2) soliloquies from the text. Consider the extent to which you sympathize with him and / or think he is self-absorbed. Explain the manner in which the literary form of soliloquy shapes your view of Hamlet. Identify one (1) or two (2) lines (except "To be, or not to be") that you find interesting or favor, and explain your choice. Pretend you are a modern leader or celebrity facing personal crisis, such as Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Mandela, Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates, Beyoncé, or some other; write a few lines of soliloquy, thinking aloud in front of the audience. (No need to sound Shakespearean). Explore
This website is owned and operated by PFS Limited.
Company Registration office is at:
2875 NE 194st St 404, Miami, FL 33180
Edudorm.com provides writing and research services for limited use only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references and in accordance with Terms & Conditions