Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

SA—Case Study Application Paper
Case Scenario

Katarina is a first-generation Korean American. She claims to be an atheist raised by irreligious parents. She is still very close to her parents and has an older brother, Young, who has always been protective of her. She has a master's degree in education and is a teacher at an inner-city high school. She is a 26-year-old lesbian, though not currently in a relationship, in part because she does not know what might happen with her work if she were to come out. She is also concerned with the reaction of her family as she is the only daughter.

Though Katarina loves teaching, she struggles to connect with some of the inner-city youth who have very different values from her own, especially those related to education. She is often frustrated by how much time she spends trying to motivate her students to pay attention and make even minimal effort on their assignments. She also confesses that she does not feel respected and wonders if it is because of her race as well as because she is soft-spoken and often shorter than her students. She admits that she would never be so disrespectful to any of her teachers and does not understand why youth in America do not value education more. Katarina has thought about quitting the job but is afraid that she will bring shame on her family if she just quits.

Katarina has turned to you for help with these issues because she really does not know where else to go.

Description of LASA:

For this LASA, you will use the case scenario of Katarina and apply what you have learned in this course and your program so far. As her counselor, you will use your textbook, the articles assigned in the course, and additional research to write a 6- to 10-page paper in APA format, addressing the following areas:

Identify at least two things you have in common with Katarina which will help to develop some rapport.
Identify at least three potential differences between you and Katarina and describe how you will address those in your counseling with her.
Analyze where you believe Katarina to be in her identity development on at least two different identity development models and how you will meet her where she is in her development. Identify what additional assessments you might use or how you might gather additional information to gain a clear understanding of her worldview.
Outline how you will advocate for Katarina and assist her to advocate for herself.
Evaluate whom you will need to include in your work with Katarina and how they will be included. Also, identify at least two community resources that you would recommend for Katarina.
Finally, address any potential ethical concerns related to working with Katarina and what actions you might take to mitigate them.
Your final product will be a 6- to 10-page (excluding title page and reference list) Microsoft Word document written in APA format. Utilize at least five scholarly sources.

Submission Details:

By the due date assigned, save your work as M9_SA_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit the document to Submissions Area.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria   
Maximum Points
Rapport Development: Identify at least two things you have in common with Katarina on which to develop some rapport.   
36
Cultural Considerations: Identify at least three potential differences between you and Katarina and how you will address those in your counseling with her.   
36
Identity Development Analysis: Analyze where you believe Katarina to be in her identity development on at least two different identity development models and how you will meet her where she is in her development. Identify what additional assessments might you use or how you might gather additional information to gain a clear understanding of her worldview.   
60
Advocacy: Outline how you will advocate for Katarina and assist her to advocate for herself.   
52
Resource Collaboration: Evaluate who you will need to include in your work with Katarina and how they will be included and identify at least two community resources for Katarina in your area.   
48
Ethical Considerations: Address any potential ethical concerns related to working with Katarina.   
40
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e. APA); and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.   
28
Total:   
300

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

What is the relationship between social conditions, such as housing, and drug use? Compare human and animal studies. How are they used in creating policies on drug use and drug addiction? Under what conditions should policy makes expect a decline in drug addiction?

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

how change and/or stress can impact a person’s life. Look especially for how sudden, unanticipated (non-normative events) events can impact a person’s quality of life.

*Write a summary.

*Describe the main points of the article and how they relate to the week's course and text readings.

*Use the lessons and vocabulary found in the readings. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic and should be original and free from plagiarism. Follow APA guidelines for the writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

Write a 500-word analysis paper. • Directions: Below you will find links to two articles on a controversial moral issue. Select one of these articles and write a critical analysis of the author’s reasoning. Be sure to cite your sources using the MLA style. o Read both of the following articles and select one to analyze: o § James Martin, Why gun control is a religious issue § Marko Kloos, The Gun is Civilization • Using the methods of creative and critical thinking developed in this course, carefully analyze and criticize the article you have selected. Discuss whether the author of the article proves his/her conclusion by the reasoning he/she uses to back it up. This involves the following analytical activities: • o Checking for fallacies in the author′s premises, o § Exposing mistaken assumptions, § Suggesting a creative solution to the main problem you find with the author′s view. § Checking for accuracy of factual claims, § Showing that there are objections to the author′s argument that the author fails to address, § Determining whether the evidence provided is sufficient to establish the conclusion § Suggesting a creative solution to the main problem you find with the author′s view.

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

HOW DO YOU THINK THE WORD PARTNERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS  WILL EVOLVE AND ADAPT  IN THE 2021 AND WHAT DO YOU THINK LUXURY FIRMS SHOULD UNDERTAKE TO DEVELOP AUDIENCES FOLLOWING THE COVID- PANDEMIC? HOW WILL INFLUENCERS AND DIGITAL TALENT WILL SURVIVE AND WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMATIC IF ANY THEY FACE?

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

1. Briefly discuss the general types of research (see below). Address any similarities, differences, and/or overlap between any of them.
   
   - Action Research
   - Descriptive
   -Explanatory
   -Exploratory
   -Replication
   
   Provide at least one example for how each of the general types of research has contributed to the overall field of your area of interest

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

Q1. On p. 39, Kripke introduces the concepts of de dicto and de re modality. a. Explain the distinction between de dicto and de re modality according to Kripke [see pp.39-42 followed by nine arguments for de re modality]. Provide at least one example of a what Kaplan calls a syntactically de dicto modal statement and one example of a syntactically de re modal statement. What is the syntactic idea behind the distinction? b. For the following, assume that syntactically de dicto modal statement are semantically de dicto and that syntactically de re modal statement are semantically de re (warning, as we have noted in class, Kripke himself does not always follow this norm, e.g. p.41 “the winner of the election might have been someone else.”). Assume further that Kripke is correct that names are rigid designators (in the sense given in class). [The Office Hour Notes from 5/5 may be relevant.] Given that, in fact, Nixon is the winner of the 1968 presidential election (henceforth “the winner”), a. Could Nixon fail to be the winner? (i.e. could it be the case that, is it possible that Nixon fails to be the winner?) Explain your answer. b. Could the winner fail to be Nixon? Explain. c. Could Nixon fail to be Nixon? Explain. d. Could the winner fail to be the winner? Explain. e. Is it the case that the winner could fail to be the winner? Explain. f. Is it the case that Nixon could fail to be the winner? Explain. g. Is it the case that Nixon could fail to be Nixon? Explain. h. Is it the case that the winner could fail to be Nixon? Explain. According to Kripke, which of the above statements are true and which false? Give a short justification for your answer. Q2. Suppose that the King is authorized to name towns, and the King′s courtiers, who know that there is an unnamed town (and only one town) at the mouth of the Dart, convey this fact to the King. Let us accept that the King that knows what he has been 2 told. The King then stipulates (out loud) that ″Dartmouth″ shall be the name of the town at the mouth of the Dart. Now consider the statement: i) Dartmouth is the town at the mouth of the Dart. a. Does the King know this? Do the courtiers know it? Is there any difference in the way the King knows (i) (i.e. the epistemological status of his knowledge) and the way the courtiers knows (i)? Discuss. b. What is the modal (metaphysical) status of (i)? Discuss? Now suppose you are in a geography class at UCLA and in discussing the English city Plymouth, the teacher tells you that ii) Plymouth is the city at the of the mouth of River Plym. c. IsthereanydifferenceinthewaytheKingknows(i)(i.e.theepistemologicalstatus of his knowledge) and the way the teacher knows (ii)? Is there any difference in the way the teacher knows (ii) and the way you knows (ii)? Discuss? d. What is the modal (metaphysical) status of (ii)? Explain. Q3. From the bottom paragraph on p. 90 to the end of the middle paragraph on p. 94, Kripke attempts to lay out two pictures of how the reference of a name is determined. Kripke’s picture seems not unlike the one presupposed by Mill, except that Kripke is acutely aware of the difficulties in the network whereby names are “spread from link to link”, what Kaplan called name moving. a. In your own words, describe the two pictures. What role do name giving and name using play in each of the two pictures? b. How does Kripke’s picture relate to your answer to Q2a and Q2c? c. Does Kripke’s picture support to his p.78 claim “Even when Theses (2)-(4) are true, Thesis (5) is usually false; the truth of Theses (3) and (4) is an empirical ′accident′, which the speaker hardly knows a priori”? Explain. [Parts of the Lecture Notes for 4/21, 5/5, and the long, edited notes from 5/26 may be relevant.; also the Office Hour Notes from 5/20 and 6/3.] [CONTINUED] 3 d. Does Kripke’s picture support his p. 78 claim, “Only in a rare class of cases, usually initial baptisms, are all of ( 2 )-(5) true.”? Explain. How does this claim relate to your answer to Q2a?

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

Here are the mandatory information that must be included:

Name of province or territory

Where in Canada is this place located

Picture of the flower/animal that is the symbol for the province or territory

Population density/number of people residing in this province or territory at the present time

The cultural makeup of this province or territory...provide facts to support your answer

Information about two people or organizations that have provided significant contributions or support to the province, territory, (or Canada).  The information provided MUST be factual. This contribution can be to support any cause… and it can be in any form, such as monetary, words of wisdom to motivate others, athletics, environmental support, military, musical influencers, frontline workers (e.g., doctors, nurses, grocery store clerks, bus drivers, police officers), and protesters.

          You can also do a ‘Did you know…?’ to enhance your assignment.

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

provide a brief essay that includes a response to the question below. Note, some programs may require an additional essay or personal statement. Visit the school(s) Program Materials page for further instruction.

Describe an experience that demonstrates your interest and commitment to your chosen health profession. (Masters of Science in Respiratory Care

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

What is the Relationship between Belief and Knowledge, and what role does Logic play in Justifying Belief?

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

According to Chapter One (i.e. citing examples) after the domestication of agriculture, please provide two examples of the development of civilization. In a short paragraph, using complete sentences and citing examples, please tell me what you think are key examples of the evidence of the development of civilization.

Questions and Topics We Can Help You To Answer:
Paper Instructions:

According to Chapter One (i.e. citing examples) after the domestication of agriculture, please provide two examples of the development of civilization. In a short paragraph, using complete sentences and citing examples, please tell me what you think are key examples of the evidence of the development of civilization.